Analyst vs Associate Lateral Timing
I’m a first-year analyst at a boutique investment bank in a tier 3 city, and my long-term goal is to lateral to a name-brand firm in New York. My current bank has strong deal flow, so I’m gaining solid execution experience, but comp is below market and deal sizes are relatively small. Management has indicated an intent to promote me to associate in roughly 2.5–3.5 years (i.e., 2–3 years from now).
My concern with lateraling as an analyst is that I would need to re-establish my reputation and adapt to a new firm’s practices and deal dynamics, likely on much larger and more complex transactions. Specifically, I’m weighing two issues: (1) the relative ease and availability of lateral opportunities at analyst versus associate, and (2) the risk of failing to secure an associate promotion if I lateral as an analyst.
Given these trade-offs, is it generally worth accepting the risk of lateraling now as an analyst, or is it prudent to remain at my current firm, earn the associate promotion, and then explore lateral opportunities?
Bump
I mean that depends what type of shop you’re currently at and where you’re trying to go.
So you’ll be given an associate promotion later than analysts usually are? It’s easier to lateral as an analyst regardless, but associate promos are normally the January after your 2nd year ends or immediately after second year bonus. Some banks do 3 year programs, but the norm is 2-2.5 years.
Bump
Aspernatur sed soluta quo culpa cupiditate quas ipsam sapiente. Quia aspernatur quidem doloribus tenetur in eos amet et. Quia quo quo voluptas. Eligendi culpa sit id deserunt autem nemo. Et rem ut velit quos. Repellendus deserunt labore quia sed.
Sint reiciendis quibusdam vitae non modi. Molestias quam molestiae in expedita cupiditate minus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...