BB Debt Capital Markets - Exit Opps / Comp

Was wondering if anyone could share insight on the typical Exit Opps (mainly buy side) + Salary and Bonus for a DCM Analyst.
I've also heard that it's pretty common to move internally to an M&A/ LevFin group after 2 years in DCM.
Thanks!

 
Most Helpful

I ended up accepting a DCM offer for a BB and asked a ton of these questions to numerous people before doing so. This may be a slightly long post but I'll tell you what I've learned.

It seems like buyside exits are atypical/opportunistic for DCM analysts (I'm excluding lev fin when I say DCM). They can happen but DCM analysts aren't targeted because coverage/M&A/LF get more relevant modeling experience. Most of the DCM exits I've heard of (to buy-side) are one-offs to hedge funds that traded the product you had experience with or maybe even MM PE. Basically: nobody goes to DCM for buyside exits, but they're possible.

I dont think it's "common" to lateral to M&A/LF/coverage after your second year, but it's possible and it's the most likely juncture for an internal move. You just need to have good reviews, have seniors in your group who will vouch for you, and have spots open in those groups.

I've also heard that many people join DCM eventually wanting to do IB, but end up so satisfied with the lifestyle and comp in DCM that they decide they want the stay on as an associate (and beyond). It might be hard now to stomach being in a less-sexy group but when you're walking out at 8pm every night before the IB guys even get their comments back (and youre taking home same range of comp) it must be a good feeling (yes, clearly some bias here, but it's the truth).

Where DCM gets a bad rap is two main things: 1) poor exits relative to coverage/M&A, 2) "simpler" work, not modeling intensive, etc. I've addressed the first point, so I'll adress the second. Many people say DCM work can be boring vs IB, and the reason for that is that most of the work is very process-oriented. You own a particular product, and most of the time it looks very similar. You're never reinventing the wheel, just tweaking terms and details based on who the client is. Where DCM makes up for this "monotony" is in exposure to the markets and faster deal flow (deals are faster and there is a higher volume).

To end this verbose post I just want to mention that I met a number of people in DCM that had actually left IB to join DCM. This surprised me as a college student who couldn't fathom leaving sexy IB for no-exits-DCM but it made a ton of sense: they said they DCM offered a far better lifestyle, less hours, little weekend work, more predictable schedule, more access to senior bankers, leaner teams, faster promotions, etc.. It all makes sense.

Note on comp: at the junior level it's the same as IB (at least at my bank), but the more senior you get your bonus takes a slight haircut vs your senior banker peers in IB coverge.

Happy to follow up on any questions the best I can.

 

This is spot on. One of my buddies from my analyst class moved to a DCM group (traditional DCM investment grade bond group) and loves it. After getting his ass beat in IB for a year he really appreciates the lifestyle. He got fast-tracked to associate and is clearing my comp with top-bucket bonuses haha.

Apparently the work flow is a lot faster than IB, a lot of "do it now" stuff pops up that takes 30-45 minutes throughout the day. Good amount of interaction with both traders and coverage bankers.

That said, he's in it for the long run. If you want to exit, it's not the best place to be and you should consider moving over to coverage as an analyst 3 if you don't see yourself staying in DCM

 

Incoming analyst so this is a mix of first- and second-hand knowledge.

I originally wanted to do IB but got a GCM offer and decided to take it, ended up placing DCM. Originally I wanted to move to coverage banking asap (between summer and full-time, after year 1, after year 2, etc.) but my mind totally changed after having all of these conversations and experiencing the work for myself and re-assessing my long-term goals.

For analyst and associate all-in comp is very similar. Base is exactly the same and bonuses are very similar (like I said, at my bank it's basically the same but at others there might be a slight decline in bonus size).

Anecdotally the two analysts I'm the closest with got a $55k bonus ($140k all-in) as an a1 mid bucket and the other got a fat $85k bonus ($170k all-in) as a top-bucket analyst 2.

You should also think about hourly comp in this situation. Even if M&A bankers are pulling in $10k more, how much more did they work? (however, remember that they have the ability to exit and you don't)

 

I didn't really get any exposure to those things. You may need to understand why a company needs the debt procedes you're issuing but you never go deep into it. You're mostly focused on the product, the market, getting the product to market, marketing the product to investors. That's been a downside to me as well: no real exposure to companies.

To be honest tho I feel like those themes you mentioned (growth drivers & opportunities, analyzing key risks, customer base, management) are very overplayed when describing coverage banking. Yes you get exposure to them, but most of that exposure is crunching numbers in a model or formatting the ppt slide where that info goes on. Obviously those are IB stereotypes but they're mostly true; analysts aren't thinking about any of those things in depth.

Where you will get big exposure to those things is PE, which is only really possible from an IB route.

But as far as your points about lifestyle, I totally agree. The rat race never really ends and (getting philosopohical here) I don't really think it's for me. I've thought a lot about what's fulfilling to me and I don't think I can achieve my (key word, "my") optimal work/life balance in the IB->PE route. Others may do what they please but I don't think that path could ever be fulfilling for me: it's hard to distill any true motivators from that path besides money and prestige. I would be a lot happier in DCM working less and still making a couple to several hundred grand throughout my career. But that's just me. If I went the PE route it would be for the wrong reasons, so I decided I'd be much better off sticking in DCM. I think others who do this have similar reasoning.

Also, purely out of curiosity, where did you summer?

 

Do any of you kids actually know how boring DCM is?

Like yes, it's still IBD (so you can still tell chix you "work in banking"), yes comp is only a slight discount to M&A groups, yes hours are more manageable etc etc - that is all true but I think you're underestimating how boring the work in this group is. Until you actually interact with clients, DCM is literally the epitome of a "market update" group. One of my closest friends worked in DCM (she moved over to a coverage group after 2 years btw) and literally the company you are dealing with doesn't even matter - it's just (1) what is your company rated (2) what is the corresponding price that Bloomberg spits out relative to the Treasury curve and that's it

You need to take into account the possibility that you will get bored of DCM. In which case you are screwed because the only tangible exit opp you have is (1) moving to a Treasurer role at a large IG corporate (extremely few positions, and usually filled up by company lifers than external hires) or (2) business school. Before you enter this group, make sure you know what you're getting yourself into - every single one of my peers who started out in my analyst class in ECM/DCM had either moved to a coverage M&A group or left to do something else completely different after 2 years

 

Yeah vanilla corporate dcm is boring sure, but structuring ABS esoteric deals, pricing complex CMBS structures, structuring complex muni debt, structuring EM corporate issue is anything but mundane or vanilla. Just adding context, in my opinion those DCM seats are much more quantitative and technical than the corporate vanilla AA+ comps on a typical corporate deal youre talking about.

 

I was in DCM at a major bank and eventually moved to Coverage/M&A (ignore the title). Everything I say here is from first hand experience/observations, so some things such as comp or exits may differ substantially from others. In general, I would not recommend DCM as a strong career path.

I worked in a corporate/vaniIla IG Bonds group and it was really interesting at first. You get to see how the IG debt markets work and keep a close eye on what is going on in the markets and economically. You'll learn the entire process of how bonds get originated, priced, and executed. It is fast-paced, but you still got good hours (55-70 hours) and minimal weekend/on-call work while at the same time getting paid the exact same as other groups such as coverage and M&A. In terms of exits, people in general moved internally into a variety of roles such as investment banking, corporate banking, or even to sell-side credit research (and before you start saying why you would leave DCM for corporate banking, at least at my bank, the pay was quite solid for corporate banking and offered a more chill lifestyle). In terms of external exits, people generally left for investment banking at other firms in usually coverage/M&A.

The issue is that DCM is VERY niche. You become an expert in the bond raising process, but it is not very transferrable at all. As other people have echoed, your skillset isn't really that of a trader, but isn't that of a banker. You may get put into a industry coverage DCM group, but you'll find that you really don't need to have much industry knowledge at all to cover your clients. I never had to understand my clients in the same detail as I currently am doing so in coverage/M&A and I believe that the reason for that is that IG clients have registrations in place, have done these issuances many times, investors are deeply familiar with the names, and the credits are less risky . The vast majority of the time it is very vanilla financing and you are repeating the same bond process over and over again. It gets old very fast and within 3 months, my entire cohort already decided to leave and would leave within 2 years, but we also came in with the original goal of doing traditional investment banking (we did keep an open mind and decided it was not right for us)

In general, DCM is still a solid group to be in, its a good experience (albeit niche) and is a good platform to move internally/externally if you want. If you want to stay, it also offers a good lifestyle especially for the compensation, but keep in mind the competition is fierce as you'll have a bunch of people trying to go for associate spots but at the top it is pretty lean. I would say we probably had like 10-15 analysts, 5 associates, M&A and this happened you would have a much wider variety of places you can go.

 

Our program was a 3 year program where you were expected to spend at least 2 years in DCM. As you near your third year, you can work with your staffer who has connections with other groups to discuss transferring groups. So in this case, it is important to have a good relationship with your staffer, your MDs, and the coverage/M&A group members/staffers. You'll want to start building this network fairly early, so don't wait till you are like 2.5 years in to start this. This is not a guarantee, but it is I would say fairly high percentage as long as you do it right.

However, you can also just network directly with coverage/M&A groups and transfer, we had people transfer after just 1 year without the help of the staffer. Obviously it is frowned upon in the DCM group, but they didn't intervene or complain with the coverage/M&A group.

I'll also say that it is not necessarily fair to say most DCM analysts just want M&A/coverage, often times they originally wanted it, but they may like DCM and stay. My cohort had people pretty dissatisfied with DCM, but the lateral cohort and new cohort had higher retention.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”