Bulge brackets will be best as they do more advisory work. Japanese and French banks are mostly lending although they get some advisory mandates here and then. Be sure to ask in interviews the split between advisory and lending work. Also note that project finance advisory is different than infra M&A (coverage) team advisory- PF advisory is focused on debt structuring, running the model etc.

 

I would say Macquaire > Japanese banks (Also Macquarie operate one of the largest infra PE in the world with great internal movement)

Project Finance, in general (as far as I have exposure to) is debt-focused mainly... in the lending world, brand name > what are they doing

Unless you are working for BB, otherwise I think Energy coverage in the corporate banks would have more exposure to advisory work

Some boutiques would offer you excellent exposure and fair pay + the selection is less strict (like Green Giraffe) 

 
Most Helpful

I was a project finance analyst a couple of years ago. Copy-pasting my comment on an older thread below (link). Info might be a bit dated and I probably would've framed a couple of things differently with the benefit of maturity but overall sentiment still checks out.

Adding some updated info as I'm currently at a BB's project finance team in NYC. We get lumped in with all the product groups in IBD (i.e. we're under one umbrella with LevFin, DCMECM etc.) and as such our base is the same and bonus is similar to traditional coverage, maybe the aforementioned 10-15% lower. Hours can be as bad as IB when you're running a deal, but on average I'd say 70hrs/week, with a couple of Sundays every month.

Our bread and butter is the advisory / bond structuring side of things, and when we lend or participate in a syndication it's usually purely relationship. Important to note that the French / Japanese banks do indeed dominate loans due to low interest rates and huge balance sheet, but we BBs outcompete them in advisory / bonds since those processes require a bit more diligence and technical knowledge. In my opinion the advisory deals are a lot more interesting and you learn a lot more leading a process rather than just lending $XXmm. Our main competitors in the space are certain other BBsEBs with debt advisory capabilities (e.g. Evercore / Lazard), and yes the BNPs/HSBCs of the world.

Most of what was said above about day-to-day is pretty accurate. We do all the modeling (coverage, e.g. energy or industrials specializes on corporate-level - we do all project-level modeling, with IBD sending us industry slides every once in a while. Stuff like "China Trade War Update on Trans-Pacific Shipping"), and my group is also responsible for origination so we take care of almost all pitches that come in, which obviously has its pros and cons (pro: more experience and modeling. con: more hours). We also work with companies across their capital structure, so our issuances could be AA or also something like B - important to note even in non-IG deals we still take care of everything, i.e. LevFin doesn't get involved too much. Coverage doesn't do jack on most of our deals which is kind of annoying since it equals more hours on stuff that really isn't our focus.

Exits are good if your group does the modeling (like mine), but if you want to do PE then you're constrained to Energy / Infra funds. Within those niches, however, you have a shot at everything, incl. the KKRs of the world. Given our strong credit modeling background you also have recruiters spamming you for opportunities at credit funds (e.g. credit HFs or Blackstone GSO). I personally am leaving to an UMM Energy fund once I finish my two years.

 

Molestiae et deleniti suscipit ut delectus. Doloribus blanditiis sint iste. Eum iste cum qui molestias. Sint quas rerum est et nesciunt.

Et eligendi dolorem tempore vitae illum natus fugiat. Ut laboriosam adipisci praesentium. Omnis placeat soluta saepe numquam ut laudantium. Fugiat ut repellendus quos autem quae maiores. Dolores voluptatem itaque ad in eos et facilis.

 

Et et velit voluptatum modi at neque voluptatibus doloribus. Occaecati ullam iusto ab qui quia. Esse ut qui qui ad asperiores quam eum iste. Voluptates nihil optio minus unde et pariatur. Laborum dolorem dolor dolorem qui unde vitae id.

Non doloribus facilis cupiditate sequi modi tenetur architecto. Fuga non adipisci enim.

Ducimus quibusdam accusamus est modi. Qui deserunt est minus laudantium magnam ex. Perferendis eveniet qui ipsum nobis et exercitationem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”