Big Law Associate $ vs BB IBD Associate $: Who makes more?
Let's say both are working at top firms in good years, who will make more in total compensation?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +228 | UBS Accused of Favoring H-1B Workers While Cutting U.S.-Born Employees | 55 | 8h |
| +134 | ONLY THESE BANKS OR YOU STRUCK OUT | 36 | 35m |
| +111 | IB Energy Drink Tier List / Ranking | 73 | 21h |
| +91 | PJT M&A Group Selection 2026 | 14 | 2d |
| +59 | Firm Thinks I'm Lying About Offer | 18 | 1d |
| +51 | Feedback for internship first desk at IBD BB - personal fit, "don't be too confident" | 29 | 2d |
| +44 | Indiana University Fraternity Pipelines | 29 | 33m |
| +39 | Stay at Weak Dealflow Team or Lateral? | 12 | 3h |
| +32 | Rogo AI | 12 | 3h |
| +31 | Elite Boutique interview questions | 8 | 5h |
Career Resources
BB IBD easily; Big Law is $160k base + ~$10k bonus for all firms on the Cravath scale. Good year or bad year big law all pays the same.
IBD Associate. Your typical IBD associate will make ~$200k+ all in as a first year, while a biglaw associate can expect ~$180k (unless you're at Wachtell, when you'll be making double that). I'd say that you work a bit less in biglaw, but the difference is marginal at best if you're in NY, maybe at 70 vs 80 hours a week. Biglaw outside of NY does tend to have better hours, but not that much, while banking's banking no matter where you go. If you're basing your decision solely on earnings potential, don't
Holy shit why does it matter? Look, do what you interests you. If you want to go into law go to law school. If you enjoy M&A work do banking. You can't just go around looking for the highest paying job, you're going to be miserable.
Troll for sure
No, I think he enjoys asking for pointless comparisons.
Not to feed the troll or further a fairly pointless debate, but it's worth remembering that associate =/= associate. At law firms associate can range from just out of law school to an 8+ year veteran.
This sounds true...I mean, just look at Katrina, she is a fifth-year associate but she's competing head-to-toe with Mike who is ostensibly only a first year associate.
lol well done
Interesting. Wasn't sure what to think of the "Of Counsel" title. What do you suppose a true in-house counsel makes in comparison?
You meant in house counsels at buy side firms? That really depends on the firm AUM, performances etc. General counsels at established firms with sizable AUMs usually are compensated well, in line with law firm partners and get carries too. If the funds perform well then in house counsels can do really well on the backend from the upsides. This is unlike law firms which usually get paid hourly rates no matter what.
Impedit voluptatem reprehenderit consequatur assumenda sint sit vel nihil. Itaque eaque ea labore aut ex dolorum. Expedita explicabo in velit vero nobis est omnis. Laboriosam similique molestiae quaerat amet nemo. Unde delectus at quae facere veniam dolores. Vel natus sed quae ex omnis expedita ut.
Fugit itaque possimus dolor. Maxime sunt culpa culpa exercitationem est. Id officiis cum quia voluptatem dolorem asperiores. Eos nostrum iure eligendi aliquam vitae corrupti voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...