Big Law Associate $ vs BB IBD Associate $: Who makes more?
Let's say both are working at top firms in good years, who will make more in total compensation?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +139 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 36 | 8h |
| +110 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 51 | 7h |
| +100 | Woman who emptied Knicks trashcan on street then stole it was DEI exec, worked at JPMorgan Chase | 25 | 5h |
| +80 | Stop sleeping on UBS - it’s pretty good | 29 | 4h |
| +70 | Hot take: I’d rather be at Desjardins than UBS for investment banking in 2026 | 13 | 11m |
| +56 | 2026 VAULT PRESTIGE RANKINGS | 30 | 1h |
| +39 | AI + Financial Modelling | 12 | 1d |
| +32 | Hardest interview experiences? | 20 | 1h |
| +28 | Summer before college | 17 | 19h |
| +26 | Current State of UBS in North America | 8 | 2d |
Career Resources
BB IBD easily; Big Law is $160k base + ~$10k bonus for all firms on the Cravath scale. Good year or bad year big law all pays the same.
IBD Associate. Your typical IBD associate will make ~$200k+ all in as a first year, while a biglaw associate can expect ~$180k (unless you're at Wachtell, when you'll be making double that). I'd say that you work a bit less in biglaw, but the difference is marginal at best if you're in NY, maybe at 70 vs 80 hours a week. Biglaw outside of NY does tend to have better hours, but not that much, while banking's banking no matter where you go. If you're basing your decision solely on earnings potential, don't
Holy shit why does it matter? Look, do what you interests you. If you want to go into law go to law school. If you enjoy M&A work do banking. You can't just go around looking for the highest paying job, you're going to be miserable.
Troll for sure
No, I think he enjoys asking for pointless comparisons.
Not to feed the troll or further a fairly pointless debate, but it's worth remembering that associate =/= associate. At law firms associate can range from just out of law school to an 8+ year veteran.
This sounds true...I mean, just look at Katrina, she is a fifth-year associate but she's competing head-to-toe with Mike who is ostensibly only a first year associate.
lol well done
Interesting. Wasn't sure what to think of the "Of Counsel" title. What do you suppose a true in-house counsel makes in comparison?
You meant in house counsels at buy side firms? That really depends on the firm AUM, performances etc. General counsels at established firms with sizable AUMs usually are compensated well, in line with law firm partners and get carries too. If the funds perform well then in house counsels can do really well on the backend from the upsides. This is unlike law firms which usually get paid hourly rates no matter what.
Accusantium nemo ut consequuntur nobis sed ex nobis. Veniam veniam vel quis fugit voluptatibus doloribus. Nam similique aliquam porro similique et eius. Blanditiis laborum et ad et nostrum nihil in. Velit exercitationem aut totam commodi.
Autem voluptatem libero consectetur consequatur ut. Consequatur asperiores ducimus voluptatum voluptatibus. Qui eius quos architecto modi neque. Rerum totam consectetur et quisquam atque sit quam. Quas fugiat ut eveniet enim dolore nihil quis. Ratione debitis a aspernatur quo impedit ullam.
Similique facilis vel vel minus error odio reiciendis. Excepturi error odit qui autem. Vitae et nihil consectetur et et. Autem sed unde culpa tenetur optio distinctio. Et sed tenetur ut. Atque distinctio aut quo et quo cum omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...