Brain Teaser question Expected Value

Here is a question I found. There are posted answers but none of them seem to really make sense. Ill post the question, the answers given and what I think.. does anyone know for sure the correct answer

question:I have 10 cards face-down numbered 1 through 10. We play a game in which you choose a card and I give you the corresponding dollar amount. a) What is the fair price of this game? b) Now, after picking a card you can either take the dollar value on the card or $3.50. Also, cards worth less than 5 are now valued at $0. What is the maximum price you are now willing to pay for the game?

Answers people given: 3.5(.4) + (4.5)*.6 = $4.10

3.5 because this is what 40% will select, 4.5 as this is the avg of 5-10*1/10.

What I'm thinking is there is a 40% chance to get a 1 2 3 or 4 which would equal value $3.50 and a 60% chance to get a 5 6 7 8 9 or 10. so i would think the answer is 5.9 .. it seems like the second iteration should be worth more than the standard first one but these people are saying its not

5 Comments
 
Best Response

A). The average of 1-10 = 5.5, which is the fair value

B). Not sure I understand the wording if the question. I assume you can't turn the card over before accepting the 3.5 dollar offer. Also, assume it is less than 5, not less than or equal to 5. If true, I would answer it like this: 5+6+7+8+9+10 = 45/10 = 4.5 (if the assumption is cards less than or equal to 5, then the expected value is 4). Either way, you would never take the offer of 3.5 (unless you were a giant pussy and assumed you couldn't play the game more than once, I guess).

If you can turn the card over and decide if you take the offer after seeing the card, then it would look like this: 3.5+3.5+3.5+3.5+5+6+7+8+9+10 = 59/10 = 5.9.

However, that would be a weird way to ask an interview question. I would expect the point of the question to be able to compare whether you should take the certain 3.5 or take the gamble for a certain expected value of either 4.0 or 4.5, depending on the actual wording of the question..

 

ok i see what you are saying about the first part of b.. i assumed the question was asked what would u pay for a game where under 5 becomes 3.5 else the same.. i guess how the wording should be is.. under 5 is zero rest the same.. you have an option of choosing the 3.5 flat payout before flipping do you flip so i see what you are saying now thanks!.. actually really easy i guess the poster just worded it weird

 

so basically the guy who is saying the answer is $4.10 is wrong i assume? The op said he was correct in staying 5 is not worth zero.

Answers people given: 3.5(.4) + (4.5)*.6 = $4.10

3.5 because this is what 40% will select, 4.5 as this is the avg of 5-10*1/10.

That makes no sense to me.. it seems like hes double counting using 1/10 to find the average of 5-10 and then multiplying it by 60%

thanks

 

The problem is that a few details are missing from the problem. You're not told whether or not you see the value of the card before you choose the $3.50 or the card. If you do see the value beforehand, the problem is really simple. If you don't, then you need some sort of criteria for choosing. Also, if you choose the card and it turns out to be worth $0 then your opportunity cost is -$3.50. If you always choose the card instead of $3.50 then your EV = (-3.5-3.5-3.5-3.5+5+6+7+8+9+10)/10=$3.10. If you always choose the $3.50 then EV = (3.5+3.5+3.5+3.5-1.5-2.5-3.5-4.5-5.5-6.5)/10=-$1. If you flip a coin to decide, then EV = $1.05. That's how I interpret the problem. It'a vague.

 

Et qui molestiae dolorum porro dignissimos ipsum quis. Reiciendis eum magni nemo quia aut cum fuga sequi. Illum hic dolorum eaque sed consequatur unde. Repudiandae tempora voluptate commodi quia odio repellendus a. Laudantium consequatur quae ea temporibus rerum.

Consequatur numquam aut numquam architecto magnam sit ut. Quas voluptatem voluptatem molestias vero veritatis cumque voluptatibus. Quia dolore rerum est aspernatur dolor ullam nobis. Perferendis eveniet sequi assumenda exercitationem suscipit omnis. Quos beatae est minus maxime omnis temporibus est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”