Break-up analysis

I'm currently valuing a conglomerate and am trying to approach with both a DCF and break-up (sum-of-the-parts) approach. I had a couple questions:

1) For the break-up analysis, the company also has a "Corporate" segment that is basically just overhead and debt interest payments. How do I include this in the valuation? Should I just allocate its EBITDA proportionally to the different business segments?

2) How much sense does it even make to run a DCF? I was thinking of running a DCF for the individual segments as well but I don't have enough info on each (missing individual balance sheets so no change in working capital at segment level, for example). Should I run the DCF on a consolidated basis?

For what it's worth, two of the 8 segments comprise 85% of revenues and EBITDA.

6 Comments
 
Best Response
valuationGURUYou could always allocate the balance sheet based on revenue in each segment in order to run the DCF. Are the two segments which make up 85% of rev and ebitda distinctively different? If not, just do it on a consolidated basis.

They aren't distinctively different -- one is oil-field services and one is construction cleanup and scrap metal. So both are relatively asset-heavy, cap-ex intensive businesses.

So you're saying just run the DCF on a consolidated basis under the assumption that the other businesses aren't material enough to move the needle one way or the other?

 
Edmundo BravermanI was really hoping this thread was gonna be about chicks.

Read it again. I think he's talking about ending a relationship... possibly a marriage considering a small part of the whole accounts for 85% of EBITDA.

 

Well also consider aspects of the two segments which may require separate discount rates. For example, if one of the companies has contracts in place with their customers, all else being equal, a lower discount rate should be applied. Also, if one of the segments is more reliant on oil and gas prices being at a certain level, than a higher discount should apply.

If you decide not to run on a consolidated basis, you may think about using market multiples to apply to either the 6 other segments, or all 8. You can then reconcile between the DCF and market multiples for the two segments.

 

Eveniet asperiores velit esse est nemo totam dolorem. Dicta eum ratione repellat dicta. Maxime quod inventore velit culpa rerum consequatur rerum. Facere eius accusamus nulla vitae ipsam. Voluptates voluptatem perferendis consequuntur qui ipsum ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”