For the sake of the argument, let's just take two risky assets in the portfolio.
Given that correlation between returns on those 2 risky assets decreased, (rho1,2), VaR should naturally decrease because the risk (volatility of portfolio) has just been decreased. However, an interview question asked me in what situation/portfolio can the VaR actually increase??? I'm all confused
| +289 | UBS Tech MD hires Son (from no-name college) as an Intern | 50 | 6h |
| +127 | Is banking in the south more sustainable? | 31 | 1h |
| +101 | The Intern Starter Pack | 18 | 11h |
| +76 | [Official] 2026 IB Analyst Bonus Megathread (with 2025 Consolidated Pay and Perks/Benefits) | 11 | 23h |
| +54 | Perella Weinberg to Cut 10% of Workforce, Including Partners | 35 | 6h |
| +40 | UBS Groups Ranked by Future Outlook | 20 | 2d |
| +37 | Are all Tech / TMT groups sweaty? | 21 | 2h |
| +37 | Is DCM actually underrated ? | 13 | 1h |
| +33 | PWP Layoffs????? | 18 | 4d |
| +32 | UVA McIntire vs Cornell Dyson for IB | 19 | 22h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
One of the assets could have gotten riskier while the other stays the same. Consider a portfolio of two assets. One returns 5, 10 or 15, and the other returns 10, 20 or 30. Currently correlation=1 and VaR=0. Now let the first asset still return 5, 10, or 15, but now the second asset returns 0,-19.3, or-12. Correlation is now -.62 and VaR has increased.
A simpler example of this is a perfectly hedged portfolio of two assets. Say correlation=1 and the gains from the first asset will always perfectly offset losses from the second and vice versa, so VaR=0. If the correlation decreases there will now be some probability of a loss so VaR>0.
You are correct
Thanks for the input mrme335! I get the idea that if correlation decreases, then the SD of portfolio decreases as well, and hence VaR increases given the VaR formula: VaR=-(mu+1.65*SDportfolio) for 95% CI. However, I'm confused at why does VaR=0 if correlation=1?
VaR is 0 in the correlation = -1 or 1 sense because you can just buy/sell the proper ratio to offset all gains and losses.
For example if you know with certainty, which you do because correlation=1 or -1, that whenever asset A increases in price by $1 asset B decreases in price by $3, then you could buy 3 of A and 1 of B. In this portfolio no matter what happens you will make, and lose no money, hence VaR = 0. The downside is obviously that you can't make money either.
Sapiente sequi aut doloremque omnis corporis deleniti. Et eos voluptas temporibus id ut adipisci iusto. Minus voluptatem fugiat dicta recusandae nostrum enim.
Nam quia voluptatem aliquam magni consequatur. Ut suscipit odio porro deleniti aliquam perferendis quaerat est. Iste beatae ut et quaerat eum odit voluptate. Vero eius natus reiciendis at corporis nihil unde odio.
Aperiam assumenda rerum dolor voluptates et voluptatem. Qui culpa nobis aut quas. Qui illum adipisci officiis ab quo.
Distinctio enim aspernatur eum qui. Enim quod maxime laudantium nostrum nostrum. Quia nostrum quia minus et aut. Aperiam hic et suscipit iste earum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...