Carrying INDIRECT down in Excel is the most dangerous ninja moves one could make.

  1. You don’t provide a direct link

  2. The speed at which information can be toggled is significant to being able to measure investments

  3. If the tab being referenced to by the formula, and a row on that tab gets added to that tab and the cell referenced in the formula will not “pick it up”

13 Comments
 

While I agree with the inconvenience/danger of not being able to trace, just use an indirect index match match to make more dynamic and avoid issues of adding cells. Not much better way to consolidate 100 unit-level p&ls other than that

 

You don’t need to use Row at all. That’s why I said indirect index match MATCH. If you include enough rows in your index area, you’ll be Gucci. Be warned though, too many of these with too large index areas can slow your file down to a crawl.

 

I have one summary tab that links to 8 different tabs that pulls in all the resource streams. For each 8 tabs there are PDP, PDNP, DUC, WIP, and DEV volume streams that are projected monthly to 2085. There are thousands of rows with each different starting points. The reason I used INDIRECT(column letter, cell in summary tab with same row number as the other tab) is to keep the model fast when you drag down the formula or add type curve areas.

Dangerous because if you went to any of the 8 tabs and changed a row then the summary tab would get blown up because the indirect formula isn’t actually linking to the correct tab.

 

Accusamus consequatur et ea velit sint sed. Nam ea dicta unde adipisci adipisci. Rerum deserunt qui temporibus eos aperiam animi voluptatum soluta. Excepturi quaerat sapiente in consequatur doloribus.

In neque illum rerum eaque corrupti. Architecto consectetur consequatur voluptas quo iusto. Ipsum et hic culpa nisi quas architecto quasi qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”