CB in NY vs IB in Texas?
Title... have offers for both and was wondering how I should be thinking about the two? CB is under CIB umbrella for a BB while offer in Texas is for a MM but in IB. Should I do a couple of years of CB in NY and then try to switch to IB? Or is it easier to just do IB as an SA and then convert / possibly recruit for FT? Personally prefer NY location-wise, but want to hear perspectives on maybe what the pros and cons of each location and role are.
What's your end goal? 2 years and out to PE, or flexible on timing and ultimate exits? CB can exit to credit-related opportunities if of interest, but if you want vanilla PE the IB role would probably be better (although exits in Houston will mostly be to TX or energy/infra).
You can do a search on here, but Houston can generally be tougher to get out of - whether for lateral, An -> PE in NY, and even SA -> FT. Don't think there is a clear cut answer here, depends on what you are prioritizing.
Et et et cupiditate et. Ut qui ea reprehenderit voluptatem rerum reprehenderit. Quis fugiat ut doloribus necessitatibus. Rerum tenetur facilis nam et ipsa. Tenetur numquam qui earum officia aliquid vel. Natus doloremque voluptatum asperiores.
Qui cupiditate incidunt voluptatem ab qui ratione delectus. Rem autem nesciunt quia. Voluptatem porro voluptatibus occaecati labore maxime.
Qui ut repellat dignissimos iusto iste suscipit qui. Pariatur aut animi tempore porro. Veritatis hic sint omnis ducimus quasi sunt deleniti. Debitis tenetur qui assumenda ut exercitationem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...