Changes in Working Capital or Non-Cash Working Capital?
Hi all,
Currently working on a DCF valuation for Spotify for a course project.
Looking at Spotify's current assets and liabilities, their cash & cash equivalents + short-term investments constitute about 80% of their total current assets.
Hence, using "changes in non-cash working capital" in the FCFF calculation would lead to a way higher FCFF compared to when using "changes in working capital", since their current liabilities have been increasing a lot more compared to their non-cash current assets.
Which of the two would you guys advise me to use, considering the type of business Spotify is?
I'm guessing I should just stick with the change in non-cash working capital.
Thanks a lot
You could cut it down the middle and just use cash required for operations. This is usually modeled around 2% of revenue. Just a suggestion, hope this helps a little.
Thanks for the reply! Do you mean splitting cash into operating cash (take a % of revenue) and excess cash, and deducting the excess cash from Current Assets?
If yes, is 2% a reasonable percentage to assume for operating cash for a company like Spotify, or perhaps a bit higher?
Yes, that is what I was suggesting. Normally 2% is normally what gets foretasted. However, if you feel like they need more cash to operate then model it between 3-5%.
Aut sunt quidem ipsum provident. Porro maxime ipsum commodi voluptas eligendi et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...