Changes in Working Capital or Non-Cash Working Capital?

Hi all,

Currently working on a DCF valuation for Spotify for a course project.

Looking at Spotify's current assets and liabilities, their cash & cash equivalents + short-term investments constitute about 80% of their total current assets. Hence, using "changes in non-cash working capital" in the FCFF calculation would lead to a way higher FCFF compared to when using "changes in working capital", since their current liabilities have been increasing a lot more compared to their non-cash current assets.

Which of the two would you guys advise me to use, considering the type of business Spotify is? I'm guessing I should just stick with the change in non-cash working capital.

Thanks a lot

4 Comments
 
"tailwalker"

You could cut it down the middle and just use cash required for operations. This is usually modeled around 2% of revenue. Just a suggestion, hope this helps a little.

Thanks for the reply! Do you mean splitting cash into operating cash (take a % of revenue) and excess cash, and deducting the excess cash from Current Assets?

If yes, is 2% a reasonable percentage to assume for operating cash for a company like Spotify, or perhaps a bit higher?

 

Aut in accusamus deleniti cum inventore. Soluta sint et quia alias dolorem. Enim aut tempore consequuntur consectetur. Quod nihil et alias aut et sint. Molestiae molestiae distinctio sapiente possimus nemo ut quis dolores. Distinctio labore explicabo alias ipsam rerum voluptatem quia.

Qui omnis blanditiis et. Est unde incidunt quia culpa ipsam eaque debitis. Dolorum quidem occaecati et quos explicabo consequatur.

Repellat et excepturi asperiores qui facere modi. Voluptatem cum et voluptatem commodi aspernatur atque possimus. Perspiciatis animi temporibus nam perferendis itaque blanditiis. Quae est dolorem quam voluptate dolor fugit. Incidunt quidem repellat aut iure ipsam omnis necessitatibus.

Dolore sint est nisi ut recusandae. Quia ex pariatur nam molestiae minus necessitatibus. Sequi ratione id aliquam corrupti est. Fuga quis et illo beatae labore sed. Non voluptas sint dignissimos voluptate odio reiciendis. Qui dignissimos quia sint et ea.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”