Honestly struggling to process things properly. Looking for thoughts on the below career paths. Not posting here just to brag.
Me: Senior at a semi-target. Good enough, but not spectacular grades (will be low magna, but not summa cum laude). A+ internships (major VC internship, EB M&A internship, top-tier BB CapM internship). Solid leadership/extracurriculars, but not the best (head of biggest club by membership/3rd biggest by budget, 'member' of a few other clubs).
Trying to compare: a) Analyst in capital markets at GS/MS/JPM in NYC b) Analyst program at non-Blackstone/Carlyle/Apollo MF PE in a minor office/unconventional city/new team c) Analyst (PM track) position at major (non-HF) asset manager in their California office d) Product Manager role at a major tech unicorn (Uber/AirBnB/Similar) - my choice between NYC and London, but the California offices are off the table
One offer is in hand, the others all have upcoming final rounds/superdays, but through various factors, a/b/c are effectively sure things (d I honestly have no idea how it will play out).
My thoughts are: 1) I really didn't like the team I was on / the work I was doing in capital markets. 2) I really enjoyed my experience in M&A (as much as an intern can anyways) and can see myself enjoying a buy-side role. 3) The people seem the best (most qualified and nicest) at b, and I know/like the city I'm interviewing for even though it is not a major one. 4) b made clear that the business is doing well, and that they are looking to promote analysts to associates without requiring B-school at any stage (assuming high performance/the fund keeps doing well). 5) The AM firm would be the lowest paying and probably the least interesting at first, but I would have a very good/close mentor, and long run compensation seems pretty solid. Also probably the easiest hours/general job. 6) Being a PM at a tech firm sounds awesome, but I think there is a reason most of them are experienced hires - I would have +/- no idea what I was doing and not much in terms of mentoring. (Their recruiter found me because I study CS in school, and tracked me for a PM role after I explained I was never going to pass the coding tests to be a software engineer). 7) The PM role would come with equity compensation in addition to salary, based on performance. IF I performed well, with equity, pay could be 2-3x as much as anything else on the table. Without equity, the PM salary would be comparable to a/b compensation. 8) The people at the tech firm are a bit.. different from who I've talked to. 2 people I know from school work there, and they were both markedly unfriendly/arrogant people.
My inclination is to go with b. Is that a smart decision all things considered?
Also, a part of me thinks I may want to go to business school. Is b the best decision if I want to go down that road?
If I were in your situation, I would almost certainly take B. A MF analyst program sets you up amazingly for a career in PE.
Now, if you're concerned more with compensation, and think you can do a good job, then perhaps option D is more suitable.
I would lean towards option 2 but you have to know that making partner at MF PE requires lots of efforts and luck. And also make sure you do actual execution work out of that office. I am not sure about the office setup in MF PE but it is such a pain in the ass if you only do the heavylifting and support work from satellite offices, which might throw you off quite a bit. You could end up transferring to NYC/HQ offices if you play your cards right.
Bottom line: you can always fall back on a solid MM PE if the MF PE track does not pan out for you. Tech can also be a viable option as well.
As an update, I went with D. The situation changed a bit - the startup is expanding a division in NYC, and hired me to be the #2 in the NY office covering LevFin. The comp package was a bit oversold, but still above the MF PE offer. More importantly, I have an amazing mentor of a boss/#1, incredible hours (still a bit unpredictable, but much closer to a 40 hour week than an 80/90 hour week), and engaging work everyday. The career path is less linear, and even tho comp is above MF PE now I know it won’t be in the medium/long term. But, it’s enough to be comfortable in NY (at least as a young person without kids), I’m happy and it feels like I made the right call. Plus, I figure that the higher rank/more responsibility combined with the LevFin focus sets me up wel for VC/BSchool/potentially PE if/when I ever decide to leave.
Leveraged Finance at AirBnb or similar? Did i misread the post?
Ex aliquid officia ex earum error et consequatur. Architecto ad quae quae facere molestiae nisi quas cum.
Autem est quia est ducimus. Voluptas officia et culpa minima asperiores. Illo amet aspernatur accusamus aut nobis est quo. Ipsam ab nihil et maiores.
Debitis molestiae et blanditiis distinctio. Repellat nam est et accusamus quas esse. Aspernatur quia perspiciatis enim voluptatem nesciunt est voluptatem occaecati.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...