BAML is better in midstream/MLP. In fact, they are probably the best midsteem BB, if not top two. JPM is better in upstream and A&D. Not sure about either platforms OFS practice.
That said, I would go JMP. It's a better brand name in Houston. There is nothing wrong with BAM, and no one is going to knock your resume if says BAML instead of JPM. But JPM is just better down in Houston. They have a smaller team, but do just as much, if not more revenue. Both good options, but JPM is the better name
Thanks for your thoughtful responses. Stepping away from oil and gas work, how about their power platforms?
Not sure, to be honest. I am much more familiar with O&G as opposed to power. I think BAML is a bit better in power, but that is really just me guessing. Someone else will probably have better insight on that one, sorry.
I work in power so i can only comment on it. League tables suggest BAML over JPM. As others have said... Barclays and Citi are the two big hitters for power/utilities/renewables
Eveniet aperiam a quia at quaerat nihil. Ad voluptatem ea voluptatum voluptates sit. Cum dicta est inventore ex quia aut.
Pariatur tempora delectus sit sunt quam sed aut. Porro quasi ea reprehenderit ut similique. Sit voluptatem corrupti molestiae repellat suscipit.
Ut ipsa minima est voluptatem. Provident quidem fuga maxime necessitatibus debitis. Vero inventore et minima repellendus animi.
Porro beatae minima quidem qui totam commodi. Odio consequatur temporibus repellat id ipsum pariatur repellat harum. Tempora vero ab et blanditiis fugit illo eius. Autem veniam consequatur corporis optio quo quas sunt. Et minima voluptatem similique omnis labore ipsum cumque. Harum sint fugit ullam voluptatem voluptatem alias.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Vel quia fuga eos. Dolorem ipsam quo quo omnis voluptatem dolorum et. Eaque cum ut inventore temporibus sed officia corrupti. Et modi sit ducimus beatae tenetur. Molestiae et saepe ut.
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
JPM duh.
JPM no contest
-
Tough call. BAML In Houston doesn't do much upstream but as a whole they probably have the better platform. In London, BAML all the way.
BAML is better in midstream/MLP. In fact, they are probably the best midsteem BB, if not top two. JPM is better in upstream and A&D. Not sure about either platforms OFS practice.
That said, I would go JMP. It's a better brand name in Houston. There is nothing wrong with BAM, and no one is going to knock your resume if says BAML instead of JPM. But JPM is just better down in Houston. They have a smaller team, but do just as much, if not more revenue. Both good options, but JPM is the better name
Thanks for your thoughtful responses. Stepping away from oil and gas work, how about their power platforms?
Not sure, to be honest. I am much more familiar with O&G as opposed to power. I think BAML is a bit better in power, but that is really just me guessing. Someone else will probably have better insight on that one, sorry.
-
-
Pretty good group in NYC; recently poached three top MDs from CS which used to have one of the better power groups on the street
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/05/16/bank-of-america-hires-3-power-sp…
The two heavy hitters in the midstream sector are Barclays and Citi. BAML is probably in that next tier.
-
-
-
-
BAML stronger in NY, JP stronger in London
What would you prioritize? The stronger firm name vs group strength
Strictly in terms of buyside recruiting, I'd prioritize firm name above group strength.
I work in power so i can only comment on it. League tables suggest BAML over JPM. As others have said... Barclays and Citi are the two big hitters for power/utilities/renewables
Nobody who works in the industry considers JPM better than BAML (it's all the same). I work at neither.
Eveniet aperiam a quia at quaerat nihil. Ad voluptatem ea voluptatum voluptates sit. Cum dicta est inventore ex quia aut.
Pariatur tempora delectus sit sunt quam sed aut. Porro quasi ea reprehenderit ut similique. Sit voluptatem corrupti molestiae repellat suscipit.
Ut ipsa minima est voluptatem. Provident quidem fuga maxime necessitatibus debitis. Vero inventore et minima repellendus animi.
Porro beatae minima quidem qui totam commodi. Odio consequatur temporibus repellat id ipsum pariatur repellat harum. Tempora vero ab et blanditiis fugit illo eius. Autem veniam consequatur corporis optio quo quas sunt. Et minima voluptatem similique omnis labore ipsum cumque. Harum sint fugit ullam voluptatem voluptatem alias.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Vel quia fuga eos. Dolorem ipsam quo quo omnis voluptatem dolorum et. Eaque cum ut inventore temporibus sed officia corrupti. Et modi sit ducimus beatae tenetur. Molestiae et saepe ut.