Circularity in Treasury Stock Method

Hi all,

Could someone please explain how there is circularity created which affects the share price of a company due to the increase in NOSH (number of outstanding shares).

Thank you very much.

A

4 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Hi, thanks for that! I understand that share price movements would cause options to be in/out of the money. However, I don't see how the share price is an input for calculating diluted NOSH.

Thank you in advance for your help!

Here is an extract from the book I am reading:

DCF valuation can be adjusted to produce a diluted equity value per share as the dilution considers exercising the in-the-money (ITM) options. The ITM is calculated using the implied equity value per share (undiluted) as the reference price to determine whether or not the share options are in or our of the money.

Dilution can be estimated using Treasury Stock Method.

The dilution creates circularity in the DCF model as the dilution will increase in the NOSH used to calculate the equity value per share. The dilution in the share price will therefore affect the ITM options calculation.

The dilution will in turn affect the NOSH and so there is circularity.

 

Not sure exactly how to explain it, but I'll try my best (from what I understand) - assuming you know TSM. In a DCF you're going to, at some point, calculate an implied share price. You can only calculate that implied share price by first using the TSM. The number of in-the-money options depends on the implied share price (this is what it seems like from the excerpt you posted). But to get the implied share price you have to first do TSM, bringing you back to square one.

That (I believe) would be the circularity. You can't calculate one with out first calculating the other. Not sure if that helps or not.

 

Molestiae non non cumque necessitatibus sit itaque. Ut officia rerum ea eveniet est autem. Hic sed soluta a voluptas dolorem excepturi.

Totam quam fugiat qui vel quia accusantium. Blanditiis laborum quis et maxime et inventore qui officia. Delectus magni iste voluptatum consequatur. Omnis quae ullam et veniam sed tenetur. Impedit et molestias sit quae cupiditate autem quisquam. Natus iste corporis minus aliquam adipisci illo.

Quia ullam natus modi et. Et facilis non et. Eveniet ad voluptatem eum hic iste amet. Distinctio quia fuga dicta mollitia aut.

Nobis sapiente dolorem sed et. Placeat sunt voluptates quam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”