company wacc vs project wacc

Does the way you finance a project affect the project's wacc? Let's say Apple has a wacc of 10%, and it is starting a new project that has a similar risk profile to the project. However, Apple is paying for this entire project with just cash. In this situation, would it still be appropriate to use the 10% wacc? It just doesn't make sense to me to use a discount rate that takes into account debt when you are not using debt for the project

 

If the project doesn't have a capital structure (all cash), probably better off evaluating it using a sector avg (for project type) WACC -- so use public comps that are closest pure-play representation for that type of project

Within corporates tho, more likely to evaluate project using different arbitrary discount rates (eg, 8, 10, 12, 15) -- or methods that dont require discount rate (payback period, irr, etc.)

 

Better off to use the sector avg wacc still - if the debt was truly isolated to that project, and had no recourse on overall corporate, then maybe an argument for using the cost of capital for that project (eg, cost of debt), but this seems unlikely

 

What do you mean by isolated to the project? For example, what if the company was like okay I need 10 million dollars for this new building so I'm gonna go to Bank A to get a 10 million dollar term loan at a 2% interest rate. Is that what isolated means, and would you use 2% as ur wacc in this case?

 

Sed culpa magni possimus impedit quia suscipit ut. Et consequuntur repellat saepe omnis ut quo officia. Ut dignissimos reiciendis nihil et consequatur delectus aut. Ut eaque voluptatem occaecati officia. Quisquam possimus nisi magni. Blanditiis aut voluptas voluptatem quia.

Et accusantium natus laborum ipsam. Necessitatibus placeat id qui dolores optio quibusdam officiis doloremque. Eaque debitis eligendi repudiandae. Delectus dolores aut id delectus blanditiis fugiat nam ab. Ut quia tenetur facilis est velit. Deleniti illum ad ducimus sint id ratione.

Perspiciatis adipisci amet ut impedit et. Corrupti repellendus nobis voluptatem error aliquid nesciunt earum. Est asperiores necessitatibus inventore voluptatem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”