DCF question post Interview?!?!?

Hi everyone. I had my first phone interview for MS IBD group two days ago. I spoke with an Associates that went over 20 min of technical questions with me. I think I answered everything in the right way, except at one point, when he asked me to walk him through a DCF. This is how I answer: 1. You take the sum of all the projected FCF discounted to 1-WACC (normally 5 to 10 yr of FCF) 2.You add the Terminal Value to the sum of the PV of FCF At this point he said how do you get TV? I told him that there were 2 ways: perpetual growth and exit multiple. He asked me what did I mean by perpetual growth. I told him that it meant that the company continues to growth a a constant rate and told him the formula. He told me that this way didn't really exist and that they don't really use it, and to focus on the exit multiple approach. So, I went on and told him that for the exit multiple you take EBITDA and multiply it to the multiple at which peer companies are trading. Then get PV of the TV by discounting it with WACC. At this point he told me that there was something wrong and that I shouldn't discount it with WACC. My questions are: Why did he say the perpetual growth method doesn't really exist? and what did I do wrong in discounting the TV with WACC? Should the TV be discounted before adding it to the PV of FCFs? Thanks in advance guys

4 Comments
 
Best Response

the dcf is real life is basically whatever the banker wants to see, which is to conclude that the dcf valuation will get you close to the offer value (for a fairness opinion) or a bit higher than the current trading value if ur on a sell side mandate (to convince buyers that the intrinsic value is better than current trading levels)

my group uses ebitda multiple method, and u discount the terminal value by whenever ur projection period is so like..if you end your projection period in 5 years, you basically do (ebitda at yr 5* ev/ebitda multiple)/(1+wacc)^5 years

-
 

Error eos voluptatem eius consequatur consequuntur ipsum. Expedita ea ut nobis odio id.

Officia iusto inventore tempore. Maxime asperiores vel id rerum optio ad. Eius aspernatur quibusdam quas nemo minus. Quae facere velit quas soluta ut. Laboriosam est dignissimos temporibus facere esse. Qui atque voluptates sed earum explicabo.

Vitae dolorum vero excepturi quia sed tempore. Maxime totam et dolore enim. Dolor dolorum ut voluptatem quia ex harum est eos.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”