Would you rather be at a direct lending fund out of school or at a LevFin team at a BB? How do exit opps for both differ? What option fares better in recruitment for other buy-side roles?
Trending Content
| +153 | How to stop feeling like shit for not making it in IB? | 57 | 9h | |
| +115 | If Tik Tok is forced to sell, what banks do you think would be involved in the deal? | 58 | 5h | |
| +80 | Updated LA Banking Scene (2024) | 59 | 4s | |
| +38 | Ranking banks that went under | 20 | 11h | |
| +34 | Burnt Out M&A ASO | 18 | 10h | |
| +32 | A strategy for SA applicants late to the game like myself | 15 | 17h | |
| +30 | Relevance of A-Levels for U.K. London recruiting | 22 | 13m | |
| +27 | Series 79 Help / Tips to Pass The First Attempt | 11 | 2d | |
| +26 | Intern Ettiquette | 4 | 21h | |
| +23 | What are hours like at BBs in London? | 47 | 20h |
Career Resources
Bump
Pretty sure lev fin, but will let more experienced ppl comment
I would rather be at a LevFin BB team.
Exit opps are likely to be broader from LevFin (direct lending, par credit funds, distressed debt, private equity, restructuring etc.) whereas from direct lending, you're likely to be more limited to other direct lending roles. Some people manage to move from direct lending to other buy-side roles, like special situations, but generally speaking, your exit opps will be more diverse from lev fin.
Hard to say on your third question. Some firms like people with buy-side experience, but almost all of the mega fund direct lending roles after c.2 years will be available for LevFin BB analysts without any disadvantage vs. buy-side analysts (they may even prefer LevFin candidates due to the wider range of experience and BB training they'll have received).
Ultimately, there's no 'right' answer though. Direct Lending pays well, is probably here to stay, and offers a more balanced lifestyle. BB LevFin can be very intense, but also very exciting, and likely offers a broader range of exit opps.
I would say LevFin. Like above said, exit opps are way better, but you're also on way bigger & more interesting/complex deals. A lot of these direct lenders focus on small to mid-cap counterparties, not my cup of tea personally and I think a decent amount of people would agree, but to each their own
Levfin if its a group that models, Direct lending at a reputable fund and generalist, unless you know you want a specific industry.
Interested to see what a reputable fund would be characterized as, I feel as thought I’d agree if the LevFin group holds the pen on the model and is a more prominent bank ex. CS/BAML/DB vs a no-name DL shop, but if it’s a reputable fund I feel as though exit opps can be great as well. Also depends if the shop does just DL, a lot of firms in the space have dived into mezzanine and equity co-invests as well giving them the optionality to invest across the capital structure, those seem to be great options imo. Interested to hear others thoughts
Golub, Comvest level shops
What's the take on those
Sed ut repudiandae aut et quidem sapiente. Quis soluta aliquam repellendus quia aliquam. Cupiditate ratione necessitatibus quod quaerat. Maxime hic alias blanditiis occaecati nulla dolorem voluptatum veritatis. Qui corrupti harum suscipit exercitationem possimus est voluptas.
Fugiat quae et enim et. Omnis aut laborum quo magni. Id adipisci laborum deleniti et. Aut ipsa et sequi voluptatem. Cupiditate ullam hic in possimus minima eum quae. Placeat repellendus delectus tempora cum quia nesciunt. Nihil qui perferendis sit.
Numquam inventore fugit quia sunt. Necessitatibus odio in optio quia natus quod quam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...