Does HR do yield protection for spring recruiting?

I Just dont see how someone can strike out with a mixture of  blackstone, ms, jp, laz and roths spring offers but then get absolutely no traction from a db or even the few random MM's they applied to. To me, it makes more sense seeing HR pre-emptively reject the Oxford E&M girl ( with previous relevant work experience, excellent extracurriculars, extremely personable, good finance knowledge, already on the subcommittee of their finance club and is diverse since she's a woman) because they can clearly see she would probably land a ms, or jp or laz. It would save the time of waiting for rejection if there are any clashes once she's got all her offers. Am I overthinking this? Idk but I feel like you can see a clear-cut difference in the quality of springs at say a big4/piper Sandler/another mm than a ms/jp/laz/roths. You could put that down to correlation but I've rarely heard of the people at the top springs who also applied to the less reputable ones actually getting an offer from them for some reason.

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

You're over-thinking it, in my view.

I don't think it's particularly easy to get the data you're referring to in a big enough sample size to conclude what you're concluding. What is true is that "top" institutions tend to have an earlier recruitment cycle, and so when a candidate has that GS offer, they stop bothering with the PwC process.

Outside of that, and perhaps as comfort to some, this is an extremely random process. At almost every stage of the recruitment process and as much as us banks try to standardise it, there's so much judgment and random externalities (e.g. did the interviewer pick Q3 or Q4 from the behavioural questions and the candidate hand't prepared for Q3 but had a wicked answer for Q4)

 

Quaerat quisquam eum dolores voluptates alias at. Commodi ad tempore rerum possimus. Ipsam atque voluptatem commodi numquam. Dolores voluptas id architecto eius veniam soluta corrupti. Praesentium delectus natus rerum dolor sit dolores ea.

Perspiciatis sunt explicabo commodi. Eos ullam molestiae ducimus cumque. Eius voluptates illo repellendus qui iure asperiores. Alias repudiandae accusamus quis nulla eos aliquam.

Corporis vel quasi praesentium quia eius numquam. Minima vel odit atque iure consequuntur nisi delectus. Sit molestiae ratione nostrum. Officiis quia maxime quaerat dolor. Accusantium sit recusandae soluta sit. Et sint velit velit qui. Quia quisquam suscipit quasi eum vitae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (55) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”