15 Comments
 

Point72 fucking sucks in terms of exits and sustainability. It’s a pod where you develop shit for skills and you’ll have a hell of a time exiting to somewhere good. You go to an EB and P72 will be available, but you’ll want a better HF and it’ll be more attainable and you’ll be better prepared.

Don’t fall for the Academy trap.

 

Point72 fucking sucks in terms of exits and sustainability. It's a pod where you develop shit for skills and you'll have a hell of a time exiting to somewhere good. You go to an EB and P72 will be available, but you'll want a better HF and it'll be more attainable and you'll be better prepared.

Don't fall for the Academy trap.

P72 is the exit.....

 

What I’m trying to say is P72 is on the lower end of desirability in terms of HF because

1) it’s a pod

2) turnover and inconsistent books

3) see above and you’d career risks shoot uncomfortably high

Don’t reply to me until you know what a SM is first...

 

As far as I'm aware, Point72's mode of "fundamental investing" actually takes shape in the form of earnings trading, rather than long term deep research. As some other users have said, the transferrable skillset you gain from this type of investing style is limited. If your goal is to keep HF options open down the road, then EB is probably a better bet. 

 

not close to the truth. last year was lower than normal, and even then was still around 60%.

 
Most Helpful

re: IB prospect's comment on "Point72 fucking sucks in terms of exits and sustainability." This is coming from someone who works at a SM you have definitely heard of with friends at pods.

1. Sustainability is fine.

Pods are stressful. So are most HFs. I know P72 will put you in a new pod if your PM blows up and you are a good analyst. You can stay at a MM and work with lots of responsibility and little bureaucracy. I have peers that print money at these firms, with varying levels of satisfaction.

2. You don't develop "shit for skills." You can move to a SM.

I know MM analysts who are extremely sharp on their stocks/coverage... "its a pod where you develop shit for skills" is a weird take I hear repeated here. The skills you would pick up at a pod are way more transferrable to SMs (if that's your goal) than the nonsense I worked on in banking. You have to know the long term view / what LT investors are playing for in order to play quarters, though there are of course differences (you probably aren't calling up 150 customers of one company at a pod). I have friends of friends who have left MMs for fantastic SMs. Great funds like hiring great people. If you are great I don't think working at a MM is going to prohibit you. What's important to realize is that having a career-long tenure at some of the SMs WSO is obsessed with is a right tail outcome.

My advice is if you know you want to work in l/s, take the academy. It will be more exciting. If you are unable to figure out what you want to do, banking is the better option. But remember optionality always comes at a price. People here seem scared to be on themselves and instead rely on past precedent + prestige... which is fine but maybe reconsider whether you want to work at a HF, an industry that is defined by risk taking. If you are actually deciding between the two, don't blindly accepted parroted takes: do your own research (talk to people with real names) and think critically. best of luck 

 

Corporis eos et non labore. Deleniti autem quidem qui qui asperiores iure. Voluptatum assumenda natus voluptates illo velit et. Quo voluptas maxime neque quisquam numquam officia nemo ut. In quis quaerat at itaque et delectus aliquid ratione. Quidem quos quo unde sint in et.

Eius ratione dolorum quisquam harum alias ratione. Aut tempora aut aut eveniet sit. At ut impedit neque nam deserunt aliquam. Ipsam iusto expedita nemo a incidunt corporis. Rem molestiae cum natus voluptatem inventore cum odio eum.

Reiciendis in et fuga et dolor. Voluptatem laboriosam dignissimos officiis quidem. Quam et in aperiam itaque suscipit impedit autem et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”