Hi! I was wondering whether you could help on the following question. When using DCFF method, you end up with the EV. Most DCF templates then substract the net debt to derive the Equity Value. However, when using other methods, such as EBITDA multiples, we tend to perform further adjustments (related to minorities, provisions, etc.) before getting to the Equity Value. Would it make sense to perform this full range of "equity bridge adjustments" when getting the EV from a DCF? Appreciate your help. Thanks!
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +137 | UBS Catastrophic Q1-Q3 26, M&A -17%, Outside Top 10 in Americas, EMEA & APAC | 37 | 1d |
| +59 | PWP acquisition by Piper cancelled | 22 | 4h |
| +29 | Evercore poaches Baird DC Defense Team | 18 | 17h |
| +28 | Houston banking Gods ? | 16 | 2d |
| +21 | Normal for lateral process to go +2 months? | 4 | 1d |
| +21 | Best Houston Banks for Culture in 2026 | 14 | 13h |
| +17 | Lack of talent in IB! | 19 | 4h |
| +17 | Internal lateral from coverage to M&A (focused on coverage) | 4 | 18h |
| +15 | How standard is weekend work in IBD? | 7 | 10m |
| +15 | Discussion Transaction Experience in Lateral Interviews | 3 | 3d |
Career Resources
Yes - Always makes sense if you're interested in equity value. Both methods give you enterprise value.
It obviously depends on how the FCF in the DCF is derived. Does it include pensions (service + interest cost)? Than of course substracting it would lead to double counting if you would substract it in the end. Goes generally for every item.
Maxime blanditiis commodi qui totam odio nisi distinctio blanditiis. Velit libero non illo magnam. Sint voluptas velit repellendus rerum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...