27 Comments
 

Thank you, that’s very helpful! One of my friend’s roommate is an analyst at CVP and has said that (obviously won’t elaborate more to preserve his anonymity). I personally really loved my conversation with the Evercore people, but interviews aren’t all that helpful given everyone is always in their sales mode

 

That is a wildly hot (read: inaccurate) take on Centerview's deal flow. My roommate works there and has been grinding, and they are bringing everyone back into the office in June as a result. A good number of CVP's deals also don't get publicly announced (I know first hand of several large transactions where they were involved), so public information is not the best source. 

As for the main point of this topic, I'd say CVP = EVR > LAZ in this case. With the deciding factor between CVP and EVR being whether you are willing to do the third year. Both CVP and EVR will give you any exit you could want, but if you want to get to the buyside as fast as possible, the 2-year path at EVR might make the most sense. If you are interested in the buyside but are willing to put in another year in banking (while getting paid on par with PE associates), hard to beat CVP.  

 

Gonna be at Evercore this summer and had an offer from Lazard. Unless you're interested in getting placed in Lazard RX, which I believe is better than Evercore's, the choice should be between Centerview and Evercore given comps and culture (I felt I made the right decision after seeing nothing substantial was discussed Lazard's recent townhall). 

If you want a career in banking, Centerview takes the cake, but otherwise, Evercore should provide better opportunities for the buy-side (supportive for recruiting).

 
Most Helpful

As others have said, I would nix Lazard and decide between EVR and CVP. Really comes down to culture and and if you’re willing to stay on for three years. If the thought of staying 3 years doesn’t turn you off, I would go to CVP personally. On par with EVR for prestige and scale of transactions, but has a stronger emphasis on mentorship and actually viewing junior bankers as team members that are worth investing time in (this might seem like a crazy concept, but a lot of places just treat juniors like a resource and don’t take the time to bring you into the deal process or actually explain the rationale behind what’s happening). 
 

As far as deal flow, I find this pretty hard to believe. I don’t work there, but have seen them across the table on many major transactions. They have a lot of rainmakers... CVP staffs on an “account” based model I believe, so your friend’s accounts probably just aren’t very active right now (essentially as an analyst you cover client XYZ, so whenever there is a deal or meeting for client XYZ, you are responsible for it. This is nice because you can really get to see the lifecycle of the client relationship and develop a deep understanding of their business, but can lead to some weeks being brutal and other weeks light).

 

Would love more understanding on this as CVP’s account system seems identical but when discussing with bankers at both firms about it my intuition pulls me to think that it’s slightly different.

Do you take on more one-off requests as part of “strategic advisory”? Maybe CVP sells it better but their emphasis on it leads me to believe perhaps they’re more involved on accounts outside of the deal than EVR.

Would love more color on this!

 

Rerum ea dolor culpa vel deleniti. Consequatur natus nostrum quia. Et animi sed eos. Explicabo voluptatum voluptatem repudiandae a quisquam dolorem modi quia.

Sed sit ullam assumenda facilis praesentium doloremque. Adipisci nihil officiis sunt. Inventore est alias consequatur ducimus optio aspernatur. Impedit sed ut ut error.

Laudantium nesciunt odit eius id ratione eum cumque. Et enim architecto consectetur assumenda. Voluptatibus aut reprehenderit quia velit. Recusandae quis ut quibusdam et aut. Voluptate nesciunt accusantium quam totam nostrum adipisci. Voluptatem asperiores ut officia debitis animi. Nostrum voluptatum id nemo.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”