Fraud on Wall Street?

In the latest issue of Rolling Stone, the magazine’s financial reporter, Matt Taibbi, writes a story called “Wall Street’s Naked Swindle,” in which he claims that evidence suggests that there was massive manipulation (specifically a whole lot of naked short selling) that helped fuel the collapse of Lehman and Bear and that the Fed, SEC, etc. has not yet taken action against the cheating bastards.

In the article and in his blog, Taibbi also claims that Goldman may be partly responsible for the events of mid-March or, at the very least, culpable for deliberately spreading misinformation about naked short-selling in their lobbying efforts to congress.

Unfortunately, because Rolling Stone is still hanging on to the analog age like George Bush to revisionist history, the magazine has not yet posted the article on its website. But,

of Taibbi talking to Old Patty “Crazy Talk” Buchanan as well as others.

Highlights include quotations like, “Does the ‘C’ in ‘SEC’ stand for ‘clueless’????”

Dealbook responded a couple of days ago with a fluff article on Taibbi's claims.

And for good measure,

. America’s “most feared film-maker” (according to his trailer) will no doubt conflate this issue and make a potentially interesting topic into a high-cholesterol crapcake. How has this guy not been tarred and feathered yet?

Does anyone think that Taibbi is on to something here?

4 Comments
 

Thank you for this. I'm listening to it right now. Fascinating. I have a friend who works for Columbia Journalism Review, who I want to ask about this...

 

Non animi dolorem voluptatem magni harum. Quia voluptatum rem omnis numquam. Ut omnis ipsum voluptates accusamus. Dolorum et quos necessitatibus eum vitae quam. Dolor et sed ut et.

Consequatur repellendus est non. Aperiam ducimus repudiandae rerum voluptatem adipisci dolorem. Aliquam odit veritatis et molestias. Explicabo unde quod deserunt est. Beatae delectus eveniet aperiam voluptatum sequi. Eum incidunt similique esse atque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”