Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
Career Resources
WSO Free Modeling Series - Now Open Through
July 31, 2026
9 Free Financial Modeling Lessons
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
High Finance Applications
Guaranteed
Get at least one offer GUARANTEED
- 1:1 support
- 92% success rate
- 2,000+ mentor network
- Unlimited Live bootcamps
- AI for resume + LinkedIn
- Networking automation tools
- HireVue simulation tool
- Full course library
- Private Slack community
- 20hrs of mocks
- + much more...
Bump plz
Curious about this as well. What about even a top boutique, does gpa matter less at this point also? What about a historically top group at a respected firm? Always think it's interesting to hear how buy side firms navigate this process.
It matters less, but it still matters. It is just another data point to compare. Particularly the sooner recruiting happens, the less experience you have, and therefore the more the PE firms need to rely on your academics / limited banking experience versus your interview performance. So I would not expect it to go away completely just because you landed a job at a good bank and came from a good university.
Also, buyside firms are well aware that nepotism exists in investment banking (just as it does on the buyside). While not a huge factor, they will certainly consider whether you were hired based on connections when trying to understand your ‘story.’
Had a 3.5 and recruited from a BB. Non-diversity male from a target. Ended up at a MF and got good looks during on-cycle. Never came up in actual interviews, but I had a tight story with the headhunters and got in front of it. They play an extremely outsized role in the process. Basically, you need to convince them you will get hired and that you’re a revenue opportunity for them. They might initially be skeptical due to lower GPA, so I think it’s really important to explain why it’s a little lower than you hoped and then pivot to talking about deal experience, performance at bank, etc. I did this successfully with all the HHs except one, which basically didn’t give me the time of day. The rest were totally on board and put me into great processes. Once you’re in an actual process with a firm/the headhunters passed your resume to them, crushing the interviews, developing rapport with the team, etc. is the most important thing, and in my experience, that can outshine any GPA concerns. Obviously, if a firm is on the margin between candidates, GPA might be a tie-breaker, but I think it’s really most important during the initial “get in the process” phase.
So assuming you recruited as a second year with deal experience to talk about. If so would you recommend waiting that extra year to have tangible experience to share? Thanks
Magnam repellat et enim dolor laborum assumenda quia. Illo rerum corporis ut aut dolorem. In quaerat et iure nemo blanditiis et pariatur.
Non quisquam nihil modi facere voluptatum quas. Perferendis error voluptas dolor ea. Quasi ut consequatur temporibus sint. Aut vel vel inventore distinctio. Amet molestiae nostrum necessitatibus dignissimos explicabo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...