How do you actually build your football fields — CapIQ, template, or from scratch?

Curious how people here handle these day to day. Building one properly — pulling comps, running the DCF sensitivities, layering in analyst targets and 52-week range, then formatting the chart — still eats a couple hours even with a decent template.

Few questions for the group:

  1. What's your setup — CapIQ/FactSet plug-ins, a firm template, or Excel from scratch?
  2. What part takes the longest / annoys you most?
  3. For those who went through recruiting recently — did you build these for interview prep, and what did you use?
  4. Has anyone found (or tried to find) a tool that just generates the whole thing from a ticker? Would that even be trusted, or does everything need to be defensible line-by-line?

Asking partly because I'm exploring whether this is automatable end-to-end and want to know if the manual process exists for a reason or just inertia.

4 Comments
 

I'm exploring building a tool that generates these from a ticker and I'm trying to figure out if the manual process exists for defensibility reasons or just inertia before I sink more time into it. Not selling anything, nothing to link. Genuinely want to know what your setup is and what part you'd actually want automated.

 

Building football fields is a meticulous process, and based on the most helpful WSO content, here's how it's typically approached:

  1. Setup Options:

    • Many professionals rely on CapIQ or FactSet plug-ins to pull data efficiently. These tools streamline the process of gathering comps, analyst targets, and other key inputs.
    • Others use firm-specific templates that are pre-designed for consistency and speed. These templates often include pre-built charts and formatting, reducing manual effort.
    • Some still prefer Excel from scratch, especially for customizations or when templates aren't available. This approach allows for full control but is more time-intensive.
  2. Time-Consuming Steps:

    • Pulling and scrubbing comps: Ensuring the data is accurate and comparable can be tedious, especially if done manually.
    • Running DCF sensitivities: Adjusting assumptions and ensuring the outputs align with expectations takes time.
    • Formatting the chart: Making the football field visually appealing and presentation-ready often requires significant effort.
  3. Recruiting Prep:

    • For interview preparation, candidates often build football fields manually to demonstrate their technical skills. Using Excel from scratch or a basic template is common, as it allows for defensible, line-by-line explanations during interviews.
  4. Automation Potential:

    • While tools that generate football fields from a ticker might exist, trust and defensibility are critical in finance. Line-by-line defensibility ensures that every assumption and calculation can be justified, which is why the manual process persists. Automating the process end-to-end might be possible, but it would need to address these trust and customization concerns to gain widespread adoption.

If you're exploring automation, consider focusing on tools that assist with data gathering and initial setup while still allowing for manual adjustments and validations. This hybrid approach could strike the right balance between efficiency and defensibility.

Sources: What kind of tools / apps do you wish existed in the industry?, Modeling question: creating your own CFS, That’s Why He’s The GOAT | The Daily Peel | 12/19/22, Is Excel Inferior ?, 7 Practical Tips for Entering 1st Year IBD Analysts

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Voluptatibus distinctio perspiciatis sint fuga perspiciatis eveniet. Et quo voluptatem quo. Quia vel occaecati et voluptas vitae.

Aspernatur ut nihil sit voluptatem vero. Veritatis voluptates ut sunt voluptas. Et possimus aut mollitia ex. Eligendi nam qui nesciunt iure sint ratione. Nemo placeat eaque maiores. Aut quidem voluptatum praesentium veniam consequuntur asperiores sunt.

Delectus nam perferendis quia aut reiciendis in pariatur. Facere eius rem nemo autem rerum fugiat. Ut facere autem quidem consequatur quae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”