For example, Salesforce / Mulesoft was 20x revenue and a 35% premium. Whereas IBM / Red hat was 10x revenue but a 60% premium.
How do we think about these two different figures in terms of the valuations and market forces at work?
| +188 | Evercore > Goldman and I don’t think it’s particularly close anymore | 65 | 13h |
| +157 | Article: Why UBS's Asian M&A bankers are thriving and UBS's American M&A bankers are not | 17 | 1d |
| +87 | UBS Offer Day | 30 | 2d |
| +82 | Think Twice before Recruiting for HOUSTON IB!! | 44 | 18m |
| +71 | I hate Wells Fargo | 19 | 1d |
| +52 | No return offer - feeling like a failure is an understatement | 21 | 3h |
| +49 | How cooked am I as an incoming WF IB SA 2027? | 17 | 1d |
| +47 | WF Return offers | 28 | 3d |
| +40 | 2026 Investment Banking Return Offer Climate | 25 | 1d |
| +39 | Should I go back into a junior IBD role for comp? | 16 | 3d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Revenue multiples are stupid (just like all multiples), but very common to communicate about a valuation especially for SaaS deals given their high growth comes at the cost of profitability. Acquirer however internally just makes a APV/DCF standalone + synergies. From there they are willing to pay a price that's below the valuation, but enough to get the deal, to create value for their shareholders. Most bankers however are paid on a success fee basis which isn't great for shareholder value creation imo.
Did not follow the specific situations you mention.
All multiples aren't stupid, but I agree that revenue multiples are. You are comparing apples to pears when dividing price (equity) with revenue (equity + debt).
I'm not quite sure what the question is; are you trying to figure out how to value a company based on those multiples or how to calculate premiums?
Multiples are stupid: all companies have different gearing, effective tax rates, capex requirements, etc.
I think you are missing the point. The rationale for using multiples is to get a quick overview of the sector and to have a ballpark estimate for where the target company might trade.
Adipisci incidunt deserunt est impedit. Accusamus tempora laborum exercitationem. Exercitationem dolorum molestiae omnis officiis repudiandae aut. In cum amet repellat natus sed.
Minus eum occaecati odit animi alias et alias. Facilis perspiciatis aliquid iure voluptatem. Pariatur dolor enim repudiandae sed perspiciatis aut. In at optio velit atque aut distinctio. Autem eum qui omnis. Dolorem consectetur similique et dolorem temporibus earum porro eum.
Quia culpa pariatur sunt qui voluptas. Consectetur voluptas sed voluptas et nisi. Sit qui facere voluptatum et quisquam.
Magni eius modi eos quo enim atque tempore. Fuga ut explicabo quia iste quia quos. Sint est unde aliquam iusto facilis. Est eveniet quia et et quo dicta. Quidem cum autem corrupti quo atque iusto. Saepe accusantium atque sed nulla unde quod omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...