If all you had for a given company is its revenues, would you feel more comfortable applying industry gross margins or industry EBITDA margins to try and GUESStimate that company's operating profitability? My hunch, is that gross margins are more stable than EBITDA margins. Hence, a guesstimate of gross profit would be more reliable than an guesstimate of EBITDA using industry averages. Is that correct?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +209 | Downfall of Qatalyst | 41 | 1h |
| +166 | UBS IB 26Q2 a Disaster! Advisory Revenue Down 23%, Capital MarketsDown 5% | 22 | 2d |
| +109 | UBS Americas IB: The Kids’ Table of Wall Street | 14 | 10m |
| +81 | Lincoln International Return Offers | 42 | 21h |
| +50 | so confused about 28 SA timeline | 27 | 5d |
| +44 | London IB BB is a challenge | 28 | 1d |
| +36 | momentum of Rx groups | 11 | 22h |
| +35 | Fired during interview | 6 | 1h |
| +33 | [WSO MODS] Please Delete This BS Host Books Spam! | 2 | 4d |
| +22 | Associate 3 in ECM - Worth Moving to Broader Advisory? | 8 | 1d |
Career Resources
since you want operating profitability, wouldn't it be better to use ebitda since it accounts for all costs of the business instead of gross which accounts only for cogs? I may be wrong, but the structures would be varying from one firm to another. So wouldn't ebitda margin be better for operating profitability since it shows a company's performance without accounting its structure? feel free to correct me if I'm wrong
Some companies could differ in their cost determination method (while one can consider a certain expenditure a cost, other could account it as an administrative expense), therefore, leading to different gross margins in the same industry. To avoid this, I would certainly look for EBITDA margins.
Apologies, I think I phrased my question incorrectly. Say if we realigned everyone's cost determination method to the same rule. Empirically, which measure is more volatile across companies within a given indistry, gross margins or EBITDA margins?
In this case, I would say that EBITDA margins are more volatile. Companies can have different sales structures (wholesale, distribution, etc.), administrative structures, and therefore different SG&A expense ratios as % of revenues. I have seen one case that illustrates this and is related to pharma companies: one global pharma company acquiring part of a small lab's portfolio, and the key metrics used for analysis were gross margins by product.
I'd imagine that this depends on the industry you're looking at. Specifically if the typical cost structure is more variable cost (eg consumer products/wholesale & distribution) or fixed cost (eg airlines/logistics) driven.
Dicta non dolore et. Eos eaque exercitationem in repudiandae fugiat. Voluptas blanditiis fuga provident perspiciatis saepe recusandae qui fugiat. Rerum quidem tenetur tempore.
Eligendi voluptatem et mollitia nihil quo vitae delectus. Et molestiae hic ipsa animi et asperiores cupiditate. Soluta eos adipisci nesciunt ipsam temporibus accusamus.
Voluptatum numquam nemo nihil id culpa quam repellat. Aut magnam consequatur asperiores et facilis nam. Commodi magni dignissimos eum harum molestiae. Soluta ut molestias in. Accusantium occaecati ducimus commodi repellendus ut hic.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...