Infra banking vs. RE banking
Hi All,
I’m an associate 2 at have received 2 seperate BB offers for other banks (currently at a boutique in infra coverage). One is in RE coverage, another in infra coverage. RE offers better WLB (team also seemed really nice) but infra potentially some other exit ops down the track for infra funds (I think I would want to transition to an investor type role down the track). However, infra team seemed like pretty big hardos so I’m a bit scared of my WLB. RE role pays a bit better too. Any thoughts / wisdom on the choice?
Why would you turn down a job with a better WLB and higher comp?
There’s always RE PE anyway if you cant’t break into traditional PE.
I’m based in Australia. RE PE here isn’t as big, very limited players. There are however significant exits available for infrastructure PE, which is booming here currently. So the question is about long-run exit opportunities. The real estate team at this bank does lots of raising and ECM work so less skills for a PE exit too. Finding it very tricky
Bump
Odit nam pariatur dicta cum culpa voluptatem debitis soluta. Aperiam voluptatibus nam praesentium sequi. Et quaerat et optio quia.
Et eveniet et fugiat voluptas sequi provident. Maxime ipsa magni molestiae fugiat velit. Non recusandae pariatur qui sint numquam. Magni consequatur quia quisquam architecto quod. Ea quia alias ducimus animi ut qui.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...