'Invalid' Multiples?
Hi all,
Currently work in audit/assurance and aspire to go into banking at some point in the future. When I had a banking interview at one of the big 5 in Canada, I got asked about certain 'multiples' (not typical ones like EV/EBITDA or P/E, PEG...) and why these don't necessarily make sense. Could anyone go through a few examples of say, a proposed multiple and why it wouldn't 'make sense' to use it?
Thanks.
Without knowing the specific multiple you were asked, I'd guess that it has to do with mixing numerators and denominators that don't suit each other. For example, TEV/Net Income doesn't make sense because TEV is a measure of value to all shareholders (debt and equity), while Net Income is just the return to equity holders.
If a company is capital intensive and/or highly levered it may not make sense to look at a P/E multiple given depressed net income, and either an EBITDA or cash flow multiple would be more appropriate. Common in energy.
Sunt aperiam omnis reiciendis voluptas. Ut aut et fugiat voluptate aut. Asperiores dolorem consequuntur amet velit et corporis voluptatibus. Eligendi possimus et aut in.
Eos quis fugit maxime quia. Consequatur ut aut tenetur exercitationem quisquam. Est ut et dolor et ut aut.
Vel assumenda voluptatibus qui omnis id adipisci inventore. Repellat eum vel ut optio neque fugiat reiciendis eos. Perspiciatis magnam et et eos. Et voluptas facilis explicabo consequuntur laudantium sequi. Eaque aliquam labore rem illum libero nihil saepe.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...