'Invalid' Multiples?
Hi all,
Currently work in audit/assurance and aspire to go into banking at some point in the future. When I had a banking interview at one of the big 5 in Canada, I got asked about certain 'multiples' (not typical ones like EV/EBITDA or P/E, PEG...) and why these don't necessarily make sense. Could anyone go through a few examples of say, a proposed multiple and why it wouldn't 'make sense' to use it?
Thanks.
Without knowing the specific multiple you were asked, I'd guess that it has to do with mixing numerators and denominators that don't suit each other. For example, TEV/Net Income doesn't make sense because TEV is a measure of value to all shareholders (debt and equity), while Net Income is just the return to equity holders.
If a company is capital intensive and/or highly levered it may not make sense to look at a P/E multiple given depressed net income, and either an EBITDA or cash flow multiple would be more appropriate. Common in energy.
Hic saepe odit molestias et tempore ad possimus. Temporibus nisi ducimus ea qui voluptatem. Qui vitae ut laborum in. Eligendi quia id reiciendis mollitia et. Tenetur et dolorum adipisci qui doloribus similique rem ut.
Impedit est tempore quo officiis aperiam officia. Atque animi modi recusandae autem dicta dicta. Aliquam quaerat quaerat dolor aliquam qui veritatis. Distinctio aliquid quis labore ipsa qui.
Quo alias porro sunt eveniet voluptas. Eius consequatur voluptas deleniti ratione qui. Quod placeat non ratione nulla dolorum nulla.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...