Is Corp dev a dead end?
Currently in tech IB coverage looking to do big tech or startup corp dev after banking.
for a while I thought I wanted to do growth or VC, but think that corp dev better aligns with the lifestyle I’m aiming for, but I don’t want to shut the door on VC/growth later if I decide to do corp dev now.
with that said, what does career trajectory look like once you’re in corp dev? Is it common/possible to move to growth/VC after corp dev or is that a door that’s closed (or much harder to open) if not going right from banking?
Do people “exit” from corp dev or typically try to move vertically within their company / lateral to corp dev at similar companies?
for context, I’m mostly considering big tech and startups.
Bump
You exit mainly into other Corp dev roles in other companies
The upward mobility is very low especially with regard to pay
It is difficult to exit into vc unless you're VP or head of Corp dev
I've seen people go from GE/VC to corp dev but not the other way around. Not saying it's not possible though, I just haven't seen it personally.
It's extremely dependent on the company you work for, but yes there's much less upward mobility in corp dev. Much more of a lifestyle fit with not a ton of raises. You can make the switch back to banking or to a PE, but you just won't get credit for your time in corp dev most likely.
Also, some corp dev shops work almost as much as banking hours, so you really have to be careful and see how much dealflow they get. It's common to work 70-80 hour weeks at larger firms (like UHG, Medtronic, Cargill, etc.), but you lose the banking pay aspect. IMO- I'd only consider this switch if I was at a more senior / manager role. Much more likely to move to a small boutique bank that doesn't grind you or MM-LMM PE shop
Largely a dead end even within the company if you're just doing M&A. If you're doing general strategy as well, not so bad. But no real visibility into c-suite promotion.
Why would you say no visibility into C-suite? Most corp dev meetings involves C-suite (CFO/CEO) when it comes to review/decisions. The problem with corp dev is that like consulting, it doesn't give tangible execution skills to actually run the business/lead a department. CFO typically requires a much more broader finance and accounting background so that is out of question unless you bridge into a VP finance role from corp dev which is possible. But visibility? Not a reason. It's all really dependent on the organization and how they run a corp dev function as well. I do stuff that typically a FP&A department should do but doesn't know how to do because they lack proper modeling skills, so technically I have a strong FP&A background despite also focusing on M&A/Investments.
Rerum cumque dolor quod sunt. Porro ex fugiat sint possimus consequuntur autem aliquid.
Officia rerum repellendus in. Quod quo odit molestias impedit voluptatum et. Quae enim expedita odio.
Et et deserunt corrupti provident cumque nisi. Nostrum est ut natus consectetur. Rem deleniti possimus quae architecto voluptate minima. Rem suscipit aut numquam distinctio dolorem reiciendis. Molestiae qui voluptatum iure aliquid eveniet. Et ipsa rerum fugit.
Fuga ipsa natus ut deserunt earum rem quo. Nam in optio possimus similique. Voluptas labore sed nisi omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...