Is healthcare services IB dead?

Seems like HC services and particularly provider services have a really tough couple of years lately. I don’t know what could really change or break the log jam. Is Healthcare services IB ever going to be the same again?

8 Comments
 

You can’t really roll up private practices that have already been rolled up. Likely will be a lesser amount of new ones due to fewer full fledged providers coming out of med school / CPT codes incentivize large health systems greater than private practices. There’s a few niche subverticals where the PPM rollup strategy is still effective, (gastroenterology, ophthalmology, etc.) but sector volumes overall a lot lighter than what it had been

 

Anonymous Monkey:

Is it a permanent shift or will things see a return to normal


Could be some “second bites of the apple” I’d imagine but from a returns standpoint it would likely be lesser than the first deals as a whole …

variable I’m curious about is the amount of people coming out of medschool over the next 3-4 decades given how expensive it’s become… will likely see more responsibilities added to midlevels and some sort of AI usage to bridge the physician gap versus the number of people 65 and up seeking care. Don’t even get me started on the implied quality of care.

Our health will be in the hands of Lauren, (Arizona State, KKG, 2.0 GPA) and a computer … take your vitamins

 

Great take, will also say anecdotally as someone whose friends with many fresh medical attendings -- a lot of most lucrative offers out of training is almost always hospital / health system employers. No one wants to grow a private practice anymore (there are exceptions though, psychiatrists can make absolute bank if they do cash pay private practice in affluent areas vs. health systems and most of these small-mid sized local practices stay physician owned since they have very little overhead / no need for outside investors).

 
Most Helpful

I think in EMEA you’ve got lots of buy&builds that sponsors mark at 15x but are probably only worth 10-12x. Integrations/synergies often difficult along with regulatory and in some cases reputational risk. And there’s not really enough strategics for exits.

I think what’s currently happening is that many of these sponsors are holding on, often raising (more) junior debt to do some more add-ons and hope for valuations to recover, which likely won’t happen. They will eventually sell and if they can’t they’ll break covenants and the debt funds sell the businesses and you have a valuation reset.

That’s for outpatient services (lab, dental, orthopedics, ophthalmology etc. chains). Anything healthcare tech / software is of course in big trouble though with AI and likely not possible to do a deal at all. 

So I think if you’re in investment banking you should pitch structured financing solutions right now and perhaps also look at some of the restructuring cases.


 

 

Interesting at least in the US markets, deal flow in healthcare tech / software has picked up significantly at the sponsor level. If anything, AI's potential use cases in the space for cost cutting seems like an appealing investment. I've noticed that outpatient deal flow has died down significantly past the MM and beyond (you will still hear of small private practices getting bought up, just not at the scale that it was so often done during ZIRP times).

 

Ex non voluptas adipisci labore. Autem voluptatem quos eligendi reiciendis. Adipisci quia minima qui id suscipit qui.

Animi in non dolore sit. Enim error qui facilis. Officia dolorem autem odit ad. Totam sint ad provident aut inventore distinctio. Porro explicabo nisi ipsam voluptas. Beatae aperiam qui et doloremque consequatur provident vel quam.

Et dolor illo totam dicta molestiae odio tenetur aut. Non exercitationem veniam quidem quam fugiat consequatur doloribus. Iusto libero et molestiae et sit. Distinctio temporibus quia accusantium quisquam repudiandae. Ab cupiditate quia quia quos. Et et in in fugiat. Dolor consequuntur labore molestiae dolores et ut non recusandae.

Et ad distinctio a animi et molestiae tempore voluptate. Est quo atque porro vitae beatae est quae ut. Quasi cum dolore molestiae voluptates unde officia. Deleniti unde nostrum fugit quis sunt. Voluptatem nemo quis quia error.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (47) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (74) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”