Is it always true that r>g? (DDM related questions)
In DDM model, we always assume that r>g. (If not, it make no sense mathematically.) In real business, except some extreme cases, is it always true that r>g?
In DDM model, we always assume that r>g. (If not, it make no sense mathematically.) In real business, except some extreme cases, is it always true that r>g?
| +407 | Evercore Intern Seizure | 62 | 10h |
| +116 | UBS IB Americas has failed, now behind Santander and Stiffel | 33 | 35m |
| +79 | JPM M&A is Gone??? Purely Coverage Banking??? | 44 | 2m |
| +60 | How do I understand vs. just memorizing? | 11 | 13h |
| +49 | Some banks are overrated as fuck | 14 | 2h |
| +48 | Associate & Above IB exits | 18 | 15h |
| +48 | The good and bad with Wells Fargo | 15 | 2h |
| +41 | Sent my Claude prompt to 200+ Teams chat. MD wants to see me Monday. | 24 | 43m |
| +36 | Incoming IB Analyst: Best Ways to Prepare? | 13 | 12h |
| +31 | Tech to IB Pivot | 20 | 1d |
Career Resources
You use this for a perpetual growth risk should therefore always cost more than perpetual growth if not your growth assumptions are probably incorrect or the company hasn't reached a mature state of growth.
Thanks a lot!
If you project 8%+ growth until.. forever, better check the size of your company versus the world economy in 100 years. Expand the forecast in order for the growth to come down and reach a steady state from where you can take a terminal value.
Thanks, that really helps!
haha unless you work at Lazzard
Aut est optio magnam cum et exercitationem. Rem ullam debitis ut eaque maxime porro minus dignissimos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...