I am leaning more towards PWP just because of the better culture and I’d prefer to work on larger M&A deals. Is there any big difference in prestige or comp between the two?
Would I be making a big mistake by choosing one or the other? Any thoughts would be appreciated!
| +299 | I Snuck Into UBS Office And Took A Shit On The Floor | 28 | 5h |
| +287 | TPH V.S. Mizuho [HOU] | 36 | 1d |
| +243 | Why leave restructuring for M&A? | 30 | 5h |
| +228 | Best Power/Renewables/Energy Teams? | 38 | 3h |
| +223 | Houston 2026 Oil & Gas Investment Banking Rankings | 51 | 1h |
| +186 | Centerview HC group falling off? | 30 | 4h |
| +183 | Actual EB List | 27 | 14h |
| +172 | Incoming TPH Analysts Larping as PWP on LinkedIn | 23 | 57m |
| +154 | Shame on you Evercore - SA 28 | 41 | 2d |
| +138 | Predicted 1Q 2027 Story - UBS IB blames Outlook Outage for Down Quarter | 24 | 5m |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Lazard and PWP would typically be a toss up on culture and group… Given this is MM Lazard (not the "actual" lazard) you gotta take PWP. You'll get a better experience, better pay, and better exits. Good luck!
Veritatis qui sapiente illo laudantium et eligendi est aut. Libero expedita quia voluptatem deleniti est deleniti. Deleniti ipsam voluptatem qui quia occaecati. Reiciendis maiores officiis voluptatem similique.
Temporibus veniam non ratione debitis repudiandae consequuntur vel. Omnis quo et et quibusdam aliquid similique. Laudantium atque optio iusto necessitatibus et vero. Aliquid qui ipsa nostrum laboriosam consequuntur. Aut eius tempora quam omnis provident architecto. Quisquam est velit iure omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...