Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +219 | Downfall of Qatalyst | 42 | 9h |
| +167 | UBS IB 26Q2 a Disaster! Advisory Revenue Down 23%, Capital MarketsDown 5% | 22 | 3d |
| +111 | UBS Americas IB: The Kids’ Table of Wall Street | 15 | 13h |
| +81 | Lincoln International Return Offers | 42 | 1d |
| +52 | so confused about 28 SA timeline | 27 | 6d |
| +51 | London IB BB is a challenge | 31 | 1h |
| +37 | momentum of Rx groups | 11 | 1d |
| +36 | Fired during interview | 6 | 17h |
| +33 | [WSO MODS] Please Delete This BS Host Books Spam! | 2 | 5d |
| +27 | VP Lifestyle at Top BB Coverage Groups | 13 | 9h |
Career Resources
There was an article in the wall street journal about this topic on Monday.
The COO spoke at my school earlier this year. He talked about how Lehman is not as good as the "brand" would lead people to believe. But he was really passionate about leading Lehman to the top, and said that working at Lehman was a great opportunity to grab some of the "low-hanging fruit" within the firm (ie, have more responsibility and prove yourself by handling big projects).
That's basically because it's more risk averse than its competitors, and the stock price has been depressed (again, compared to competitors, and only in the short term). A merger with UBS/HSBC would be probably dilutive, and idiotic (look at DLJ/CS). And the trading platform still dominates
thanks for the summary
Voluptatem ipsa enim sint qui quaerat. Dolorem est eum quo dolores.
Laboriosam non ipsa aspernatur vero. Magnam quisquam et est. Maiores porro autem quis repudiandae voluptatem. Nesciunt sed assumenda nulla debitis neque ut sed.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...