Litquidity Comp Survey
Has anyone noticed that litquiditys comp survey is consistently wrong?
Noticed three banks in particular CS, DB and Moelis that are extremely inconsistent (and reported much lower than) from what I’ve heard first hand.
Has anyone noticed that litquiditys comp survey is consistently wrong?
Noticed three banks in particular CS, DB and Moelis that are extremely inconsistent (and reported much lower than) from what I’ve heard first hand.
| +149 | Piper Sandler in talks to acquire PWP | 66 | 56m |
| +141 | Just One More Year | 11 | 2d |
| +116 | UBS Appears to be Exploring Sale | 16 | 8h |
| +79 | Bringing Deals as a Vice President | 25 | 6h |
| +75 | Paradise Is Paradise | 5 | 1d |
| +38 | Q&A | Investment Banking Analyst, UBS | 2 years in investment banking | 11 | 2d |
| +32 | M&A is Paradise | 1 | 3d |
| +31 | Will they pay Directors $1mm+? | 14 | 3d |
| +28 | Drunk VP. How to manage? | 15 | 2h |
| +26 | Best Groups at UBS NY | 10 | 1d |
Career Resources
It’s largely wrong I know A1 at DB who got 80 as an A1
Piggybacking here, but have you seen the full database? I imagine there may be a bit better context there to see where things get thrown off.
On a sidenote, I don't want to pay $10 for it and frankly it feels a little contrary to the whole "transparency" thing lit has been pushing. I get that there's bills to pay, but I don't see the endgame in charging $10.
/rant
Quia molestiae veritatis impedit dolorem commodi eum sed vero. Iure ut aut nemo vel. Nostrum quia voluptatem numquam provident. Voluptate voluptatum quisquam cumque ut. Repudiandae ut quia cumque et. Quasi eaque deleniti laboriosam quam.
Molestiae modi sunt occaecati quidem. Doloribus architecto velit voluptatem vel commodi harum quasi. Quia iusto commodi blanditiis expedita.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...