LP-leds vs. GP-leds

Would appreciate if someone could provide a better insight on LP-led advisory.

GP-leds seem to be all the buzz now with continuation vehicles as the hallmark advisory product, and LP-leds are rarely touched on in this forum presumably due to being very vanilla (?)

From an advisory standpoint, is it really as straightforward as selling the manager’s pedigree? Assume valuation work is very high level as it almost always involves interest sale in a fund holding multiple assets. Would love to hear about potential intricacies, challenges, and factors that make LP-advisory work interesting.

4 Comments
 

An LP-led secondary sale is decidedly more straightforward than a GP-led, but can still have its own quirks that make it difficult. The most common challenge is probably crafting a sale portfolio that checks as many of the sellers boxes as possible. Since secondary buyers are bidding at a discount to NAV, sellers will often outline a “maximum dollar loss” threshold that they don’t want to exceed. The issue is that the funds that trade at or near par on the secondary market are the best performing funds, which makes the seller reluctant to offload them because they would just be left with their worst assets. If they try to sell just their worst performing assets and keep their trophy funds, they will get abysmal pricing that essentially makes the sale process moot. A good LP-led team knows how to strike an appropriate balance that garners buyer interest while also meeting the seller’s liquidity needs. Modeling is typically done to justify secondary pricing estimates that the team provides and will be fund level as opposed to asset level.

 

This is a noob question but what is with all these secondary transactions? I understand CVs and think they make a lot of sense for all parties, but how frequently are GPs / LPs actually selling stakes?

I get there’s serious fund issues (i.e. tiger) or a one-off LP who needs liquidity, but generally speaking why is someone selling a PE fund stake? Work at an UMM fund and all our LPs are either big SWFs, pensions, etc and I would assume all of them are smart enough to understand they aren’t getting money out of a PE fund early without giving up a lot of the upside / would expect they manage investments appropriately to meet cash needs

 
Most Helpful

Velit voluptatem dolorem aut aliquam. Dolores et dolorem nostrum qui.

 

Explicabo maxime expedita voluptatibus. Autem similique rem dolores suscipit pariatur. Est at adipisci voluptatem et. Sit sit fugit libero exercitationem. Eveniet aliquam et optio incidunt ea ad sit. Animi molestiae velit modi officiis.

Itaque harum aut possimus sunt earum perspiciatis eum. Veniam vero iusto adipisci consequatur rerum et. Tempora sunt non in accusamus nobis mollitia aut. Repudiandae nemo consectetur expedita minus ut.

Aut fugiat corporis ipsam. Velit repellendus repellat dolores possimus voluptas. Sapiente sint aut pariatur fugiat. Unde occaecati illum autem accusamus suscipit.

Perspiciatis et ut asperiores doloremque explicabo in dolorem. Laboriosam reiciendis nulla ut consequatur. Placeat cum qui sint necessitatibus omnis sunt. Cum odio aperiam repellendus quia veritatis. Eligendi vel qui blanditiis id enim et et placeat. Dolore ducimus et et.

[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Doloribus ex hic et. Quia placeat voluptas cumque molestiae commodi ipsam ex. Vero dolor ratione amet aut ea molestiae. Neque nisi laboriosam pariatur consequatur sed saepe. Dolorum ea quaerat impedit cupiditate voluptatum explicabo sint. Omnis nulla ut consequatur.

Et odit error sed dicta quia. Incidunt voluptatibus exercitationem dignissimos dignissimos ut harum. Consectetur ratione quia consequatur debitis aspernatur ratione sequi ipsam. Consequatur debitis incidunt et eveniet excepturi.

Quasi quia sit et sint est ex enim incidunt. Nihil sit tempora tempora temporibus tenetur consequatur magni. Soluta et cumque magnam ut et dolor minima aut. Et dolores sunt aut totam aut.

Vel laboriosam vitae fuga consequuntur quisquam nihil. Quisquam repellat nesciunt quaerat quasi. Aut animi explicabo earum dolorem enim et. Et maiores suscipit est incidunt. Sit et eveniet rerum molestiae porro et.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”