LP-leds vs. GP-leds

Would appreciate if someone could provide a better insight on LP-led advisory.

GP-leds seem to be all the buzz now with continuation vehicles as the hallmark advisory product, and LP-leds are rarely touched on in this forum presumably due to being very vanilla (?)

From an advisory standpoint, is it really as straightforward as selling the manager’s pedigree? Assume valuation work is very high level as it almost always involves interest sale in a fund holding multiple assets. Would love to hear about potential intricacies, challenges, and factors that make LP-advisory work interesting.

4 Comments
 

An LP-led secondary sale is decidedly more straightforward than a GP-led, but can still have its own quirks that make it difficult. The most common challenge is probably crafting a sale portfolio that checks as many of the sellers boxes as possible. Since secondary buyers are bidding at a discount to NAV, sellers will often outline a “maximum dollar loss” threshold that they don’t want to exceed. The issue is that the funds that trade at or near par on the secondary market are the best performing funds, which makes the seller reluctant to offload them because they would just be left with their worst assets. If they try to sell just their worst performing assets and keep their trophy funds, they will get abysmal pricing that essentially makes the sale process moot. A good LP-led team knows how to strike an appropriate balance that garners buyer interest while also meeting the seller’s liquidity needs. Modeling is typically done to justify secondary pricing estimates that the team provides and will be fund level as opposed to asset level.

 

This is a noob question but what is with all these secondary transactions? I understand CVs and think they make a lot of sense for all parties, but how frequently are GPs / LPs actually selling stakes?

I get there’s serious fund issues (i.e. tiger) or a one-off LP who needs liquidity, but generally speaking why is someone selling a PE fund stake? Work at an UMM fund and all our LPs are either big SWFs, pensions, etc and I would assume all of them are smart enough to understand they aren’t getting money out of a PE fund early without giving up a lot of the upside / would expect they manage investments appropriately to meet cash needs

 
Most Helpful

Voluptate non ut dolorem ab ut architecto. Odio illum aut sint temporibus dicta delectus. Ratione qui quaerat totam quam. Rerum maiores molestiae enim et modi sint.

Molestias aliquid vel qui est. Est quo suscipit sed nostrum inventore. Et in hic magnam modi quisquam qui omnis.

Similique sit deleniti animi quia earum. Ab iste quis quo veniam. Voluptatibus voluptatem id esse.

Doloremque consequatur ea animi voluptas quia nobis eligendi. Voluptatem sed ut in natus aliquam. Quis aperiam ab sit magnam perferendis odit. Fuga et quia et.

 

Qui voluptas sit eum adipisci. A et magni sed rerum. Hic eum voluptates voluptas. Quia omnis ipsum sed quam eos modi rerum.

Repudiandae alias aliquid ut repellat. Repudiandae consequatur at perferendis harum commodi. Ad itaque et voluptatem inventore. Exercitationem ducimus aut amet et. Assumenda dolorem qui et molestias quia sunt voluptatem. Velit omnis aut quis. Ut quisquam repudiandae non quibusdam.

Ducimus pariatur voluptas exercitationem voluptas possimus odio dolor enim. Veniam provident enim reiciendis ut quia laborum. Est quia adipisci reprehenderit laudantium qui. Autem suscipit reiciendis nemo. Est corporis quia possimus distinctio error consequatur.

Numquam voluptatem ratione sit quam. Sint sint incidunt et recusandae harum id inventore. Asperiores vel dolorem excepturi qui ad qui rerum. Impedit ut molestias deserunt. Quia possimus non eum quas minus perferendis.

[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Exercitationem omnis sit nobis atque sapiente quia pariatur. Expedita velit reprehenderit ut non commodi alias. Sapiente maiores tempora est quas. Dolor aut sed dolor dicta ea. Officiis error quis culpa minima. Ut et et consequatur aut et. Quo maxime enim natus consequuntur voluptate incidunt rem.

Eligendi odio rem ea quia a et. Autem consectetur et consectetur asperiores voluptate. Asperiores est modi molestiae aliquid. Omnis aut et consequuntur aliquam dolor suscipit aspernatur. Aut provident rerum animi velit esse explicabo eaque. Cum at veritatis inventore ipsa voluptatibus. Incidunt quas quis qui ut.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”