Hey everyone, about to start as an analyst 1 at a mid-tier BB tech group (Citi/BofA/Barc/CS) and I'm curious about exits. I'm from a semi-target aiming for UMM/MF growth or early stage VC.
Do mid-tier BB tech groups exit well, or is there a clear disadvantage versus GS/Q/MS?
| +183 | Americas M&A League Table Q2 Updated | 74 | 2h |
| +132 | New Article: Dramatic Slide as UBS #22 (US) & New Leadership Desperately Needed | 27 | 2h |
| +110 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 29 | 2h |
| +83 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 34 | 18m |
| +74 | A COMPLETE GUIDE TO SUMMER INTERNSHIP RECRUITING | 12 | 1d |
| +51 | Boutique firm wants access to my LinkedIn? | 40 | 1d |
| +39 | Investment Banking is Hard | 17 | 21h |
| +31 | PWP vs BofA | 23 | 6h |
| +27 | Who pays the highest right now? | 14 | 6h |
| +25 | Woman who emptied Knicks trashcan on street then stole it was DEI exec, worked at JPMorgan Chase | 10 | 1h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Mid-tier BB tech groups are a pretty mixed bag, CS SF and BofA Palo Alto are probably the best among the group but marginal differences.
Believe they both exit pretty well, have seen threads about strong CS placements to Bay Area growth and tech PE. Know a guy from citi who went to an UMM growth shop in San Diego
In terms of UMM/MF exits, CS LA, Barclays LA, and BAML SF (all FSG groups that dominate west coast PE deals) are probably three of the best groups and on par with most groups at top BBs. Virtually every analyst exits UMM/MF if they want it from these groups since they are so lean.
Thoughts on how JEFF SF is perceived? I know they do a lot of sponsor work / hardware M&A
I don’t have too much info on the FT analyst exits but I think I have two friends that interned in two of those groups you mentioned. They both “exited” / lateraled to different jobs full time. The bar cap TMT NY guy ended up at BX PE FT did three years there and now is at King Street. The other guy I think did CS SF, moved to Milstein RX FT which got acquired by Gugg and now I think is an RX VP there so I would say very strong exits/career paths for those groups you mentioned based on the two data points that just came to mind for me. Good luck
Citi tech is gaining momentum. You should be able to exit well
SF right? def not NYC lol im at citi nyc
Off the top of my head, know within the past 1-2 years of 2 who left for hedge funds, 2 went to growth equity, 2 went to VC, 1 went to a solid PE shop.
.
Stop spamming the same message on every thread bro. We get it, Citi's hiring.
Honestly, all SF Tech group analysts have plenty of options exiting to tech-focused growth / vc… being at a mid-tier BB is good enough, and if you can get a great offer is really up to you. Note that IB isn't really naturally conducive to exiting to early-stage VC though, but more like Series A -> pre-IPO venture / growth
Bump
Citi Tech (last 5-years, NY + SF)
Citi FinTech
Iusto nulla blanditiis dolor quia. Magni voluptatem et voluptatem deserunt magni.
Et quasi et impedit veniam non dignissimos et. Rerum dolores qui pariatur error. Blanditiis magni harum est non est nisi ut. Veniam ut exercitationem culpa voluptates. Consectetur amet nihil modi quaerat ipsum tenetur qui.
Molestiae eum et illum pariatur eum perferendis iste. Aliquam sapiente itaque amet nam facilis dolorum. Placeat magnam voluptas quia harum.
Veniam voluptatum minus ipsa odit et. Ratione dolorum impedit rerum et veritatis eum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...