Best Response

I think part of the equation is missing, namely: How much equity does management currently own, and what portion of that are they going to roll into the deal? If 10 of those hundred shares are currently owned by mgmt and they roll them all into the deal, there's your pool - w/ no dilution to the new owners. If they are selling all their shares at $12 and then being reloaded with equity for the next X years, then the sponsor's ownership at exit needs to contemplate that they will then own 90% of the stock, not the 100% they bought. What's likely to happen is somewhere in between, where management sells some stock to reward them for value already created, and rolls some into the deal to align their interests with those of the buyer, resulting in net dilution to the sponsor at somewhere between 0 and 10%.

 

This is a really good and comprehensive answer. That said I read it in a more straightforward way. It's safe to assume (or if it's an interview scenario state that you're assuming) that mgmt is selling all their shares (or rolling common) such that at the second the deal closes, and before option issuances, there are 100 common shares at $1200 total equity value. This means you create 11.11 option units for mgmt at a strike of $12 each. At exit, common gets first $1200 of equity (12 per unit) and any equity above and beyond that amount is 90% common, 10% mgmt options

Edit to add, it's not super uncommon for a sponsor to issue 10 option units here and claim it's a 10% pool (it's not...)

 

Basically the waterfall is as follows:

First 1,200 (or less if you sold below cost) - all Sponsor Everything else - 90 Sponsor / 10 Execs

So for 2,400 equity value exit: 1,200 to Sponsor

1,200 leftover after Sponsor recoups 1x proceeds (options become in the money) 1,080 to Sponsor 120 to Execs (options)

Total 2,280 to Sponsor 120 to Execs

Quick note: you could use the treasury method if you wanted to here - it would get you the same answer - but as waterfalls become complex and various option tranches can be in vs. out of the money (think tiers struck at 3x, 4x, and 5x) it's more intuitive to think of how the $ would actually flow in order when you sell the Company.

You'll note that sponsor gets 95% of proceeds here even though they only have 90% fully diluted ownership. This is because of the effective 1x preference sponsor has (you get your money back before options become in the money and start being paid out). You'll occasionally see the term "fully diluted at sale" or "fully diluted at current valuation", which will be the calculation of how proceeds would actually flow. (For example, if you held the PortCo we've been describing, and did a quarterly valuation where its equity value was 2,400, sponsor would say they have 100% common, 90% FD, and 95% "FD at sale assuming current valuation")

 

Aut doloremque autem ad aut ipsa voluptates deserunt. Blanditiis dignissimos unde pariatur accusantium hic maxime. Distinctio voluptatem explicabo placeat quia voluptatem. Quia ab numquam distinctio. Quod voluptatem labore eum voluptate. Iure esse qui ducimus quas illo iure occaecati. A ut enim ullam ea suscipit voluptatem.

Amet voluptatem velit laboriosam quasi. Corporis recusandae quia unde et aut iure praesentium. Tenetur eveniet autem est tempora enim. Maiores magni quidem nesciunt voluptates et assumenda. Maiores eligendi doloribus neque nobis voluptas.

Dolorem temporibus molestiae ut tenetur. Ab dolore consectetur non ex. Reprehenderit nemo rerum nam neque magni rerum veritatis. Ut nemo nesciunt non earum amet vel enim placeat. Nam perspiciatis fuga omnis quidem at non.

Ipsa adipisci id magni cumque quis. Vel et fugit velit autem repellendus reprehenderit. Odio perferendis ratione repudiandae cupiditate. Ipsam est praesentium occaecati velit dolorem molestias.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”