http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/09…
Recent party studies done by Yale create a picture of America's largest political groups' opinions of global warming and related matter. Tea Partiers take the cake. I am extremely worried about this group.
| +136 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 36 | 5h |
| +109 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 51 | 4h |
| +99 | Woman who emptied Knicks trashcan on street then stole it was DEI exec, worked at JPMorgan Chase | 25 | 1h |
| +82 | Stop sleeping on UBS - it’s pretty good | 29 | 41m |
| +70 | Hot take: I’d rather be at Desjardins than UBS for investment banking in 2026 | 11 | 25m |
| +56 | 2026 VAULT PRESTIGE RANKINGS | 30 | 1h |
| +39 | AI + Financial Modelling | 12 | 1d |
| +32 | Hardest interview experiences? | 18 | 8m |
| +28 | Summer before college | 17 | 19h |
| +26 | Current State of UBS in North America | 8 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Dude, it's POLL, not POLE.
I clicked here hoping to see strippers.
Dammit.
You beat me to it
Thanks for the post, now get back to homeroom
Unless you were trying to do a play on words with "pole" as your pic is a polar bear and the ice melts from the north and south poles... but I highly doubt this was your intention
I guess by their own standards its accurates. The majority of Tea Partiers state they need no information whatsoever to form an opinion on global warming, by that standard its not surprising they consider themselves the most informed.
What sticks out to me is just how much of a political left/right issue the environment has become. It shouldn't be. Everybody wants clean air and such, but I guess it's just a function of how to get it. Global warming especially has become a huge divide.
HAHA, ok tear me a new asshole for pole, i deserve it. I was at work at 6am this morning which is way to early for me to generally give a shit. but still... shameful
Pot...kettle.
Kettle... pot.
Most right wingers don't believe global warming is caused by humans, that's the divide.
Besides, when you have the left wing media covering this, do you think they are going to show Tea Partiers in a positive light?
First of all, Economist is right wing. Second of all, the actual study is by Yale. Even if they are historically left leaning, they are an institution and don't let their judged biases affect their works, as it is a poll. It is just straight forward data.
I said liberal left wing media, I didn't specify the Economist. yes, I know, that's where this poll is.
I never argued with global warming/climate change. I just don't believe it's caused by man.
whatthefuckamireading.jpg
sure the poll itself may be unbiased (who they polled, when, etc. can add bias) but the research itself necessarily isnt. east anglia university anyone?
universities are the most biased institutions in the world, worse than governments.
Sooooooo.... you guys do realize that the earth has been COOLING since 1998, right? And that the increase in CO2 levels that Gore claimed to be the cause of warming actually was preceded by the warming by 800-2000 years on average prior to changes in the CO2 levels? And that in the 70's there was a huge scare that the earth was COOLING too much and that we needed to do shit or else the gulf current was gonna stop flowing to europe and the oceans would freeze over and shit?
Perhaps "Global Warming" is too literal for some people. Climate change then. And rise in CO2 is not caused by warming, it is the cause of warming. Hope you just have your words mixed up. And you can try and argue it as much as you like, but its happening. I grew up in mountains, over the years the weather patterns have become more fucked. Idk how this is even a legitimate argument? It is science accepted by almost every scientist and universally by every other country in the world.
http://greenanswers.com/q/131679/climate-change/effects-climate-change/…
http://greenanswers.com/q/131679/climate-change/effects-climate-change/…]
lol. Is this one of those 80% of statistics that are made up on the spot?
http://greenanswers.com/q/131679/climate-change/effects-climate-change/…]
Pff w/e bro I can do that too.
http://www.iceagenow.com/World_temperatures_falling_as_CO2_levels_keep_…
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/3624242/There-IS-a-pro…
lets go swiming in a pewl
Nah dawg, rises in CO2 are preceded by rises in temperature. Makes sense because there would be more digestion when things get hotter, and all the little animals and everything releasing more shit in to the atmosphere. Check out the five facts listed here:
http://joebarton.house.gov/Issues.aspx?Section=52
Lol, its science accepted by people who manipulate data to support their findings and of an ex vice president who has made hundreds of millions peddling it, thats for sure.
Haha, your source is so laughable. Its on a party website whose platform is in denial of global warming? Talking about twisting facts. And idk why you'd think people would WANT to twist facts about global warming? I mean to what end would they do that? So Al Gore had a hit, but you think he's in cahoots with scientists all over the world?
Idk, just seems like you've lost touch with reality. Source is awful. You probably also believe that 9/11 was a gov conspiracy. Whatever, I'm not even going to get into this with someone so belligerently stupid and ignorant about things. Post your response sure, but its not worth it, I'm done with this.
Dude are you on crack? So a guy who has made hundreds of millions of dollars off climate change alarmism has less of a motive to twist facts than this random assed congressman, based off of the fact of the congressmans party? Way to go not disputing a single damn thing I said sherlock.
Protip: There are references to every fucking thing he said at the bottom of that page. These are federal agencies and peer reviewed journals. Take a minute to actually look at the shit you're talking about next time.
Qui provident non aliquid quis. Amet et blanditiis ex labore. Repellat dolore vel odit eum deleniti eveniet rerum. Sapiente fuga autem sed labore. Et fugit nihil dolorem iste sunt. Et eos qui ab.
Fugit consectetur temporibus beatae dolor magni. Molestias quos sed aut quasi minus illo harum. Autem sit provident aut eos aut doloremque perspiciatis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Voluptatem neque eligendi sequi. Natus laudantium enim expedita exercitationem dolor eligendi iusto. Quidem suscipit eius eaque quaerat quae ab cum. Delectus corrupti cupiditate quia fuga harum.