Most Helpful

For WACC, you could just look at what it is for public comparables and use that. If the private company has registered debt securities, then you have the (after tax cost of debt * % of debt in capital structure) term for WACC. Then, you'd only need to find levered beta for the private company to get the equity term portion of WACC. To do this, you'd find levered betas for public comparables and unlever them. Then, you'd take the average or median of the unlevered betas and then relever this to private's capital structure. You can easily calculate WACC now because you have cost of debt and cost of equity and the proportions of each in capital structure.

Typically, the perpetuity growth rate is usually around 2-4% because it picks an economic anchor such as inflation or nominal GDP growth. Usually, this method is more so of a sanity check to see if the implied growth rate, based off the exit multiple, is realistic. It's not really used to determine the terminal value unless there's no relevant public comparables. To answer your question, usually you'd do a sensitivity analysis with a smaller range of growth rates from in between 2-4%. For the exit multiple, you'd look at LTM trading multiples for public comparables.

Hope this helps

 

This was great help. Thank you very much. I just have one question. So when comping up with the implied enterprise value, you would rely on the exit multiple rather than perpetuity growth? I thought you would show both with the two different implied EVs that come from the perpetuity growth and exit multiple

 

I don't want to say always, but yes, most of the time you are going to base your implied EV off the exit multiple. If there aren't relevant comparable public companies, then you might resort to the perpetuity growth method. The reason why perpetuity growth method isn't often used for the valuation range(as determined by a DCF) of implied EV is because it's unrealistic. Think about what the PGM implies. It assumes the company will generate cash flows forever and never stop operating. When would that ever be true in real life? Almost all companies have a fixed lifespan and eventually stop operating, even the best ones.

Like I said before, it's mostly used as a sanity check. You would use an exit multiple and then determine the terminal value. Then you'd set this terminal value equal to what the terminal value for the PGM formula would be(input FCF and WACC) and backsolve for growth rate. This would be the implied growth rate. Say your implied growth rate is like 6%. This is quite unrealistic in the long run for a company's cash flows to grow at, so you'd probably revisit your exit multiples and scale them down.

Hope this helps

 

Voluptatum officiis odio similique saepe fugit debitis voluptatem error. Numquam aut est voluptas suscipit earum.

Dolor corporis odit eum veniam. Vel aut consequuntur autem eligendi quia. Ea sint rerum dolore ut explicabo velit. Ut ipsam eum aliquid deleniti ut rem. Magni sequi omnis excepturi vitae consectetur eum voluptatibus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 18 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”