I'm working through Pearl and Rosenblaum now and in their sample DCF, the assumptions for Days Sales Outstanding are per the image attached, or linked below.
Shouldn't the downside cases have higher days outstanding since shorter DSO's means the company collects cash faster?
Or am I just confused....
| +331 | Return Rates For Interns Are Falling? | 140 | 1h |
| +148 | Article: Why UBS's Asian M&A bankers are thriving and UBS's American M&A bankers are not | 17 | 4h |
| +139 | Evercore > Goldman and I don’t think it’s particularly close anymore | 55 | 1h |
| +123 | I am a drunk MD AMA | 40 | 1d |
| +86 | UBS Offer Day | 30 | 20h |
| +69 | Santander IB? | 10 | 3d |
| +68 | I hate Wells Fargo | 19 | 6h |
| +51 | No return offer - feeling like a failure is an understatement | 20 | 1h |
| +43 | WF Return offers | 28 | 2d |
| +41 | How cooked am I as an incoming WF IB SA 2027? | 13 | 6h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Bump. Can anyone help?
Yes. You're right. Its a type. DSO should be HIGHER for "downside" cases.
Nostrum eveniet vitae asperiores quibusdam voluptatem id autem. Dolores illum sit accusantium repellat. Et odit non vel consequatur quia et non. Repudiandae est ad quis ullam rerum. Praesentium veniam natus et expedita architecto nihil quia voluptatem. Neque similique aut accusantium aspernatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...