Senior Reputation

Hi all. Throughout this forum on some threads I've seen some people give pretty detailed insight into which seniors are the "rainmakers" and bring in deals, and which seniors tend to be weaker. I was just curious how y'all are able to figure those things out and know which seniors were responsible for originating the deals, on on the flip side, which seniors have been dead weight at their banks and haven't done a single deal in years. Is it just something you learn after spending a few years on the job through exposure?

4 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Can only speak to my experience.

"Dead weight" MDs are fucking insufferable. Understandable considering how much pressure they're under to deliver but an absolute pain in the ass to work with. Lots of micromanaging, volatile and at least the ones I've worked with, lots of unnecessary work. When there is no strength or depth in a client relationship, the fallback for people like this is massive decks with every piece of analysis under the sun. I had one MD in particular who would sketch out like 60-80 slide decks and the days leading up to pitches would trash like 60% of the work. 

The rainmakers I've worked with don't lean on massive presentations full of scenarios and analyses. They have really strong relationships and have  a good pulse on what the client actually wants to see and what would win the mandate. A really good understanding of the business, and the landscape - who's buying who, who is writing checks, who would be the best fit as a target, the right partner as a financier or buyer, that sort of thing. There is one MD I work with now who generally takes at most 4-5 slides half of which he writes himself and walks out with mandates. Absolute baller. 

 

There are two primary ways I believe:

First is word of mouth. Over time, certain big names consistently pop up in conversations and people just "know" who are the rainmakers. Big name MDs I can of think of as I type include: Skip McGee from Lehman/Barclays, Alan Schwartz from Bear/Guggenheim, Ben Lorello from UBS/Jefferies, Paul Taubman from MS/PJT, Aryeh Bourkoff from UBS/LionTree, etc.

Second is personal experience. There tends to be a negative correlation between amount of BS and how much dough a MD brings in. Rainmakers won't ask you to boil the ocean on a pitch, for example. Rainmakers tend to win sellside mandates via relationships and in person meetings, not on how pretty a deck looks.

 

I think what you're trying to ask is how people know so much about specific players in this industry, versus how do you tell the difference between an MD that sucks and one who balls out. 

Same way people who habitually pay attention to sports news/gossip figure out who the key players are on each team. You look at enough press releases and work on enough syndicates, etc. and over time you get a pretty good sense for who the movers and shakers are within your neck of the woods. When people talk in extreme specifics about several different Senior Bankers at one group it is typically because they have direct experience working for that group, competing against that group or working across from that group (on the buy-side).

 

Quaerat dolorem id illo suscipit aut totam. Impedit et voluptatem voluptas id aut ipsum. Voluptatibus cumque voluptatem pariatur molestiae a. Unde sunt aut quo. Consequuntur rerum explicabo rerum ex sit officiis. Expedita sed expedita deserunt nesciunt repudiandae excepturi ut.

Repellendus rem fuga quia doloribus ut. Aliquid dolor tenetur fuga delectus eum ut. Error et culpa est nisi. Alias aut enim est iure.

Velit quo eos est aperiam fugit. Vel iure ipsum quisquam libero eum. Error eos qui omnis ut modi laboriosam sed. Molestiae quia aliquam aliquid accusamus debitis eaque iure. Omnis officiis corrupti perspiciatis quibusdam consequatur.

Quam suscipit sint reiciendis animi officia. Labore repudiandae nihil dignissimos officiis distinctio voluptatem. Aut omnis eveniet assumenda est dolorem. Consequatur ea dolor dolorem optio dolores recusandae. Quia est aut beatae nostrum ratione autem. Dolor placeat culpa corporis corporis occaecati.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 11 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”