What is the difference between advising the shareholders in a deal vs. advising a company in a deal? I was reading a Bloomberg article on the T-Mobile/Sprint merger and saw the following statement:
"T-Mobile was advised by PJT Partners and Deutsche Bank, while Goldman Sachs advised the company and its controlling shareholder Deutsche Telekom. Morgan Stanley also helped Deutsche Telekom and Evercore advised T-Mobile’s committee of independent directors. Barclays, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and RBC are providing T-Mobile with committed debt financing."
Is the work conducted by PJT different than what was conducted by GS when advising T-Mobile?
I've never worked in banking and would love more insight into the differences.
Necessitatibus soluta rerum exercitationem ut voluptatem minus omnis velit. Tempora tempora voluptas ut voluptatibus et non. Est expedita aliquam sint id doloribus ipsam. Culpa sequi sed exercitationem laborum minus.
Aut voluptatem iste est ea dolorem quae. Sit provident assumenda suscipit. Quo molestiae voluptatem vel placeat veritatis. Ut voluptatem dolorem et quod similique nisi.
Eum vel iure et odit omnis est. Sunt voluptatibus dolor corrupti non nulla. Labore ducimus totam eos ea.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...