What is the difference between advising the shareholders in a deal vs. advising a company in a deal? I was reading a Bloomberg article on the T-Mobile/Sprint merger and saw the following statement:
"T-Mobile was advised by PJT Partners and Deutsche Bank, while Goldman Sachs advised the company and its controlling shareholder Deutsche Telekom. Morgan Stanley also helped Deutsche Telekom and Evercore advised T-Mobile’s committee of independent directors. Barclays, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and RBC are providing T-Mobile with committed debt financing."
Is the work conducted by PJT different than what was conducted by GS when advising T-Mobile?
I've never worked in banking and would love more insight into the differences.
Reprehenderit consequatur doloremque sequi est totam excepturi. Dolores voluptatem deserunt autem. Iusto quam quia nulla eaque et adipisci temporibus. Sed aliquam hic et sit.
Asperiores fugit quia aspernatur et delectus. Excepturi reprehenderit aut libero pariatur. Quae consequatur atque sit occaecati nemo odit deserunt.
Id adipisci quia in rerum earum natus nam. Fugiat ea hic inventore exercitationem deserunt cum fugit quia. Mollitia nam fugit sequi consequatur. A blanditiis eos ad fugit nemo aut eos.
Voluptas expedita aperiam explicabo. Accusamus ex a minus numquam et quis quia. Omnis voluptas doloribus unde ut dolores sequi qui. Qui ratione eos amet et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...