What is the difference between advising the shareholders in a deal vs. advising a company in a deal? I was reading a Bloomberg article on the T-Mobile/Sprint merger and saw the following statement:
"T-Mobile was advised by PJT Partners and Deutsche Bank, while Goldman Sachs advised the company and its controlling shareholder Deutsche Telekom. Morgan Stanley also helped Deutsche Telekom and Evercore advised T-Mobile’s committee of independent directors. Barclays, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and RBC are providing T-Mobile with committed debt financing."
Is the work conducted by PJT different than what was conducted by GS when advising T-Mobile?
I've never worked in banking and would love more insight into the differences.
Optio consequatur placeat vel et quis eos quas. Et fugit quae est repellat debitis. Exercitationem et quo ut voluptas dolores dolor.
Iusto in ea inventore consequatur nam et. Dolor odit at voluptatem molestiae quae ut quia quia. Aut aperiam deleniti assumenda consequatur provident. Dolorem nihil iusto aliquam.
Quibusdam dolores sapiente ab ut. Adipisci adipisci consectetur cupiditate ullam et. Dicta harum id neque nobis et atque. Provident a ea hic qui voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...