Simplistic view of Revenue breakdown..
So i've been battling with my brain trying to summarize the relationships between all the components of revenue.
I threw together this table, let me know what you think?
my ibd side is crying right now
The cash and capex components don't make sense.You're right in that capex doesn't affect net income, but this is implying that they are related. This makes it seem like you get your net income and then you either spend it on capex or keep it as cash which is wrong. Capital expenditures can be whatever the company needs, independant of net income. Your model is also ignoring changes in working capital accounts
I get what you're trying to do I just don't know if its possible to represent it like that.
Esse ipsa impedit qui ea impedit alias. Voluptas quia assumenda tenetur dolorem delectus provident. Mollitia non ipsam et officia qui quo delectus. Et et quas et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...