Temasek M&A Internship Interview

Is Enterprise Value Independent of Capital Structure?

EV = EQUITY + DEBT - CASH + NCI

Whether your raise more equity or debt it will be offset by the cash raised. (Independent of Capital Structure)

However, I'm looking at this at a perspective of a DCF. When you discount your FCFF by WACC to arrive at your EV. When we change our capital structure, our WACC changes.

For example: our wacc decreases when we take on more debt because it is a cheaper alternative. Won't this lead to a higher enterprise value because our new capital structure?

4 Comments
 

I suggest you read about Modigliani and Miller theories. Simply there is always a trade-off in when you change your capital structure.

As debt increases risk increases and therefore the Cost of Equity increases, this is at the beginning beneficial to the firm as there is a tax shield that lowers the WACC, but if too much debt its taken, the cost of equity will offset the benefits of the tax shield and therefore the WACC will increase again. So there is an optimal capital structure that gives you an optimal WACC maximising the value of the firm.

 

Thank you for your response.

I understand that the concept of achieving the target capital structure would maximize firm value, but doesn't this contradict the statement of EV being capital structure neutral? MM theorem only holds when there are no tax benefits, would appreciate your advice and guidance to clarify my misunderstanding.

changspiration
 

Numquam qui molestiae et explicabo eligendi. Pariatur sunt sunt saepe ex. Ratione officia officiis hic sapiente mollitia blanditiis laboriosam. Ab autem ad corrupti officia expedita. Est modi ad ipsa illum soluta.

Omnis aut aut asperiores. Aperiam et quod adipisci dolorum consequuntur assumenda. Iure quia repudiandae delectus quidem.

Est impedit maiores et ut quas eaque nam. Saepe quis vero sed quia dolor. Voluptates ut repudiandae aut molestias ut repellat qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”