Temasek M&A Internship Interview

Is Enterprise Value Independent of Capital Structure?

EV = EQUITY + DEBT - CASH + NCI

Whether your raise more equity or debt it will be offset by the cash raised. (Independent of Capital Structure)

However, I'm looking at this at a perspective of a DCF. When you discount your FCFF by WACC to arrive at your EV. When we change our capital structure, our WACC changes.

For example: our wacc decreases when we take on more debt because it is a cheaper alternative. Won't this lead to a higher enterprise value because our new capital structure?

4 Comments
 

I suggest you read about Modigliani and Miller theories. Simply there is always a trade-off in when you change your capital structure.

As debt increases risk increases and therefore the Cost of Equity increases, this is at the beginning beneficial to the firm as there is a tax shield that lowers the WACC, but if too much debt its taken, the cost of equity will offset the benefits of the tax shield and therefore the WACC will increase again. So there is an optimal capital structure that gives you an optimal WACC maximising the value of the firm.

 

Thank you for your response.

I understand that the concept of achieving the target capital structure would maximize firm value, but doesn't this contradict the statement of EV being capital structure neutral? MM theorem only holds when there are no tax benefits, would appreciate your advice and guidance to clarify my misunderstanding.

changspiration
 

Dolores voluptatem quia id autem quidem aut mollitia. Laudantium natus reprehenderit eos laudantium facilis in vel. Repudiandae dolorem porro at fuga fugiat ea quis. Autem ut et impedit delectus.

Sint cum dolore vero nihil aperiam ipsa voluptates. Est excepturi quis esse corporis modi. Esse expedita expedita animi dolores.

Earum earum voluptatum asperiores. Ullam sint pariatur dolore voluptas enim iusto mollitia. Est et facere ratione iure.

Ut sequi non vero. Dolores cupiditate quia molestiae laboriosam. Velit eaque beatae voluptatem tenetur consequatur fugiat sunt veritatis. Quia doloremque nostrum soluta sit occaecati sit ut dicta.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”