Terminology confusion: enterprise value and value of operations

Say you are deriving equity value from Enterprise Value (EV). Many i-banking tech. interview guides as well as some posts on this website say the following:

EV + non-operating assets - net debt = equity value

But EV is what's available to every type of investors, so in case of liquidation, non-operating assets are also available to the investors. HUH? Then why are they doing EV + non-operating assets?

I'm reading Valuation written by McKinsey and here is what it says:

value of operations + non-operating assets = EV

Then,

EV - debt & debt equivalents - hybrid claims - minority interest = equity value

To me, consultants are the ones who got it right. What bankers call EV is actually more like value of operations. Or am I generalizing from my limited experience and most bankers actually do make the distinction? What do you guys think?

The reason I'm asking is, if a banker asks me what EV is at an interview, which definition am I supposed to describe?

EDIT
follow-up question:
According to the equations above, I'm guessing that the way McKinsey defined equity value is undiluted shares * price, since hybrid claims already include convertibles, options, etc. Why would McKinsey define equity value differently?

3 Comments
 
Best Response

[quote=corporateape]I hope that helps a little bit...

//www.wallstreetoasis.com/blog/a-firms-value[/quote]

Interesting article. Thanks for the link. So would you make a distinction between Firm's Value and Enterprise value? I see that you used the word Common Equity to make a distinction from equity value. And the formula you provided to find common equity is the same as what the Mckinsey book says in essence, except instead of calling it common equity, this book calls it equity value. Why would there be a disagreement? Simply because Mckinsey guys want to set themselves apart or something?

 

Nemo illo praesentium eius cumque voluptates. Non in rem ab assumenda. Non aut dicta esse dolorum eligendi vitae molestiae. Quibusdam consequatur a aperiam. Omnis aut dolore natus.

Voluptatem dolores quia accusamus accusamus. Velit incidunt earum nam minima in. Sapiente sapiente nemo qui voluptates voluptate adipisci.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”