Time value of money: rent contracts problem

Assume there are two possible rent contracts:

Contract 1: Deposit US$150,000. No rent and get back US$150,000 after two years.

Contract 2: Deposit US$10,000. Rent of US$12,000 per year. Get back US$10,000 after two years.

If my discount factor is 1% then contact 1’s NPV > contract 2’s NPV. If my discount factor is 10% then the inverse would be true.

The solutions says that c.8.2% is the breakeven point where both contracts would be equal.

However, assume my discount factor was say 4%. Under the standard calculation, contract 1 would have the following cash flows:

T0: (150,000) T1: 0 T2: (150,000)/((1.04)^2)

This would give an NPV of (11,317).

Contract 2 would have the following cash flows:

T0: (10,000) T1: (12,000)/((1.04)^1) T2: (2000)/(1.04)^2

This gives an NPV of (23,387.57)

BUT

Contract 2 has the added advantage of me having to spend US$140,000 less at the outset. That US$140,000 has the advantage of giving me cash flows of US$5,600 (US$140,000(0.04))(1.04) in the first year (the first year figure would also earn that 4%) and US$5,600 (The amount earned in the second year).

Shouldn’t these cash flows also be added to contract 2 above thus making the solution (breakeven point of 8.2%) wrong?

1 Comments
 

Tenetur fuga cum consequatur praesentium voluptatem. Amet earum porro odit dicta totam placeat. Eius error exercitationem error. Omnis eaque dolores doloribus voluptatem maxime.

Velit et amet perferendis. Earum voluptatem voluptate eos saepe et. Quod ea facilis veniam quisquam in nam libero. Est quas perspiciatis corrupti sed occaecati doloremque debitis et.

Quod sed autem aut nam. Culpa commodi qui quas velit. Non et blanditiis et. Eligendi fugit harum voluptates aut. Maxime eaque architecto numquam odit veniam amet in.

Qui vero quia facere et doloremque esse voluptates. Et reprehenderit dignissimos eius veniam blanditiis sunt. Et ab ut sapiente debitis temporibus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (68) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”