Unsecured Creditor Committee Advisory
How is Unsecured Creditor Committee advisory work viewed for Distressed HF/PE exit ops? Is it similar to a creditor-side assignment or is it considered to be lesser?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +431 | Is UBS really that bad? | 77 | 1h |
| +263 | Investment Banking is Divine | 40 | 2d |
| +219 | Another $115bn Mega deal for these banks. Congrats! | 46 | 7h |
| +216 | US 2027 SA IB worried about background check | 53 | 2d |
| +58 | Useless associates | 13 | 49m |
| +50 | Differences in Restructuring Teams? | 24 | 4h |
| +40 | Is Houston SA 28 recruiting already over? | 34 | 1d |
| +37 | Roku-Fox Deal - UBS Misses Out on yet another deals after years chasing this deal | 8 | 12m |
| +36 | How do you manage nerves in IB technical interviews? | 8 | 10h |
| +34 | FIG Pigeonholes you - is it true? | 13 | 3h |
Career Resources
Hi Prospect in IB - Ind, hope I can help. Do any of these links cover what you're looking for:
More suggestions...
You're welcome.
Bump. Interested in this as well. I know A&M and FTI have groups that specialize in this type of work.
In my mind, less of a prestigious seat and much less transferrable workstreams. UCCs are generally constituted by trade creditors and the main goal of the mandate is to argue for a few cents extra recovery vs. actually conducting business diligence and running analyses for use in RSA / term sheet negotiations.
Is this true for all 'Creditor Advisory' or just UCC specifically?
I would say specific to UCC and note that it will change on a case by case basis.
Debtor side is sometimes thought of as more "prestigious" because there is only one seat (vs. multiple on creditor side depending on the cap stack) and results in a higher fee (due to higher workload) but I actually like creditor side more. Debtor representation is primarily defensive, process-heavy work whereas creditor side is more strategically demanding and intellectually stimulating. There is also a ton more variety on the creditor side. Just my 2 cents.
You are better off doing banking at a top EB/BB if you looking to exit to distressed HF/PE. If you cant get into banking, you wont be able to break into HF/PE from UCC Consulting either..
Key to distinguish UCC from any ad hoc group / committee of unsecured creditors which may be in the same/closer class of claims as any potential undersecured creditors. in which case the work is “realer.”
Minus quisquam voluptatibus ut. Ut et sequi commodi suscipit quod repudiandae voluptatem. Quos et corrupti assumenda non corrupti. Nam est quis eos eos in accusamus aliquid. Sint hic commodi asperiores repellat tempore sed esse omnis.
Sit ad quo voluptas libero rerum quibusdam. Corrupti voluptas non et nihil illum quia dolor. Saepe tempore praesentium est id. Et quia placeat enim omnis eveniet iste dignissimos. Fuga repudiandae et nesciunt. Ratione aliquid velit autem et officiis laudantium. Et voluptas impedit voluptas vel. Facere quod omnis saepe cumque delectus non.
Recusandae repellendus non fugiat voluptatem. Expedita minima ab et quia natus.
Eum veritatis exercitationem et eum impedit dolor possimus nam. Omnis magni consequatur non nemo et ea. Minima maxime nesciunt quis voluptatem. Nemo omnis numquam accusamus provident reprehenderit ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...