Upper MM in Tier 2 city vs. lower MM in Chicago

All,

I received offers from a top MM shop (Baird, HL, HW) in a Tier 2 City (Denver, Charlotte, Minneapolis) and a lower MM (Piper, Lincoln, Stifel) in Chicago. I was just curious what everyone's thoughts were about what would be a better career option. I enjoy the people at the top shop, but am worried about lack of exit opps coming from a smaller city.

18 Comments
 

imo, city/location can make a difference but you ultimately make or break the situation. Denver, Charlotte, and Minneapolis are still great cities, but I would say that networking your way into other firms may be easier in a larger city. You could also look into how easy relocation is at the top shop and go about it that way (hang out your shingle then jump to a larger city). I'm not too familiar with MM firms, but I would consider brand as well. I think this distinction is a little easier to make when looking at BB vs MM firms, but just something to keep in mind.

 

Group fit and deal flow should be paramount in decision.

As someone who had strong experience from a MM just outside a Tier 1 city, I am always curious as to perception of MM banks.

Anyway, if your experience is strong and you knock out the role during your tenure in IB, you should not have much trouble in terms of exit ops. While it is more advantageous to be in major metropolitan, there are plenty of people who have exit to strong funds or corporate roles from other cities.

Authored by: Certified Corporate Development Professional - Director
 

I would say that Piper isn't lower MM. It is a pretty middle of the road MM shop. However, if you're talking Chicago, I tend to believe you have Lincoln.

In all seriousness, if the location is super important to you, go with Chicago. If not, go with the better bank. I think that should really sum it up. The good will need to outweigh the bad.

Dayman?
 
Most Helpful

Beatae ea beatae sed et laudantium qui. Itaque doloremque non voluptate qui dolor iure illo.

Labore autem veritatis rerum nemo fugit illum. Consequatur distinctio earum consectetur et dolorem. Nulla qui ea sint.

Qui et hic veniam soluta numquam corporis voluptates optio. Sed repellat cupiditate molestias harum. Distinctio nostrum et ratione est quasi libero quod. Ea ut molestias doloremque nesciunt consequatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”