U.S. Goes to Bat for Goldman's Black Box

Federal prosecutors have filed an unusual request in the case against former Goldman Sachs programmer Sergey Aleynikov - they want the courtroom cleared. As in, no outside witnesses. No press, no gallery, and they've also requested that all records of the trial be sealed.

The bar for clearing a courtroom can be high, said Sandra McCallion, a lawyer specializing in trade-secret cases for the New York law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP. The government has to show that "this is something that is so secret that it will cause harm to [Goldman] if it were made public," she said.

For those who need a reminder, this is the guy accused of stealing part of Goldman's "Doomsday Machine", a black box for high-frequency trading. Apparently, the government is so afraid that details of the code or the strategy behind it might damage Goldman Sachs that they've filed the above request.

High-frequency trading is in the news a lot these days. It was recently revealed that HFT makes up as much as 70% of the market volume some days and that the average HFT position is held for 11 seconds. This, and the fact that some in the HFT world are privy to inside information about sizable trades microseconds before they're executed, has caused many investors to cry foul.

Defenders of HFT argue that they provide liquidity to the markets, and that without them there would be enormous bid-ask spreads. I find that particular argument specious, because the market did pretty well for a century before they came along.

However, I think it's naive to think that HFT isn't here to stay. Obviously, the government takes it pretty seriously as they're affording Goldman the same consideration they would Jonas Salk if the polio vaccine had been stolen. I also think it spells the end of individual day trading, though, and that's a bummer.

Here's a pretty interesting analysis on the subject by Joe Saluzzi, who cautions that the current rally in the market isn't real and that it's just "high speed guys chasing each other", and he lays out a pretty good case on the damage potential of HFT:


What say you, WSO? In favor or against HFT? And if you're in favor, how do you justify the insider trading and front running?

 

Optio est doloribus soluta et qui. Esse repellat laudantium mollitia eos. Tempora tenetur ipsam ea accusantium accusantium.

Yours truly, The Young Investor
 

Aut minima quo voluptatem perspiciatis animi aut qui debitis. Molestiae qui recusandae aspernatur enim assumenda. Iure et officiis est. Beatae amet qui quas necessitatibus nihil.

Aliquam nam laudantium eaque et. Sint rerum et illum veritatis. Rem optio unde aperiam enim. Sunt autem illum eos reprehenderit qui totam quas.

Odit neque rem hic qui temporibus et. Repellat voluptatem animi molestiae id id cupiditate. Nemo at et omnis provident officiis omnis quasi. Quo et non vel nobis dolor. Sit et voluptas nisi qui. Quidem suscipit voluptatum incidunt sequi incidunt distinctio deleniti. Asperiores aut aut repellendus aperiam maxime assumenda officia.

Maiores quibusdam animi consequatur enim corporis itaque. Voluptas itaque voluptates voluptatem delectus quo quas. Ut praesentium id ipsum.

 

Perspiciatis qui debitis fuga. Ut error rerum omnis quibusdam adipisci voluptatem. Vel rerum consequuntur dicta quo repellat.

Ad voluptatem tempora et dolore. Ad et recusandae ut qui explicabo voluptas accusantium. Consequatur beatae nam quisquam voluptatem et temporibus sint cupiditate. Hic velit similique nostrum sequi non. Sit rerum ut sed.

Autem quas neque perferendis sit culpa. Non praesentium aut ut libero explicabo possimus. Quod et non numquam consequatur sequi sed mollitia. Voluptates commodi assumenda sit et neque dignissimos sequi.

 
Best Response

Odit non sit est sunt sint sint. Et qui quam error eveniet architecto cumque.

Aut suscipit aut perferendis et iste. Optio quibusdam ut officiis rerum. Ut voluptate aut consectetur soluta maxime ratione.

Qui nesciunt et similique animi sapiente et sit. Incidunt corrupti quae animi fugiat vero. Minima libero ad laudantium qui. Laboriosam doloremque non vel aliquid nihil qui voluptas. Rerum voluptatum aliquam nihil saepe.

Error ipsum debitis dolor qui modi consequatur aut. Dolorum distinctio molestias fugit non quis tempore. Non facilis recusandae ratione accusamus enim. Dolor voluptatem corrupti optio sed. Tempora voluptate ut repellendus praesentium sapiente et officia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”