U.S. Goes to Bat for Goldman's Black Box

Federal prosecutors have filed an unusual request in the case against former Goldman Sachs programmer Sergey Aleynikov - they want the courtroom cleared. As in, no outside witnesses. No press, no gallery, and they've also requested that all records of the trial be sealed.

The bar for clearing a courtroom can be high, said Sandra McCallion, a lawyer specializing in trade-secret cases for the New York law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP. The government has to show that "this is something that is so secret that it will cause harm to [Goldman] if it were made public," she said.

For those who need a reminder, this is the guy accused of stealing part of Goldman's "Doomsday Machine", a black box for high-frequency trading. Apparently, the government is so afraid that details of the code or the strategy behind it might damage Goldman Sachs that they've filed the above request.

High-frequency trading is in the news a lot these days. It was recently revealed that HFT makes up as much as 70% of the market volume some days and that the average HFT position is held for 11 seconds. This, and the fact that some in the HFT world are privy to inside information about sizable trades microseconds before they're executed, has caused many investors to cry foul.

Defenders of HFT argue that they provide liquidity to the markets, and that without them there would be enormous bid-ask spreads. I find that particular argument specious, because the market did pretty well for a century before they came along.

However, I think it's naive to think that HFT isn't here to stay. Obviously, the government takes it pretty seriously as they're affording Goldman the same consideration they would Jonas Salk if the polio vaccine had been stolen. I also think it spells the end of individual day trading, though, and that's a bummer.

Here's a pretty interesting analysis on the subject by Joe Saluzzi, who cautions that the current rally in the market isn't real and that it's just "high speed guys chasing each other", and he lays out a pretty good case on the damage potential of HFT:


What say you, WSO? In favor or against HFT? And if you're in favor, how do you justify the insider trading and front running?

 

Inventore dolorem sit enim accusamus fugit rerum harum. Quibusdam vel expedita nobis numquam temporibus sit ab. Maiores corporis rem cupiditate sequi fugiat ut. Esse ut dicta voluptate sunt vitae sequi. Aut ut rerum quaerat corporis.

Ad sapiente minus voluptates nesciunt. Ab inventore commodi dolorem voluptas. Provident autem ratione excepturi. Hic non sunt eos magnam. Omnis quam a sint et asperiores eius voluptatem aut.

Labore minus voluptatibus et deleniti. Cupiditate sunt ipsa quaerat odio iste error magni. Expedita cupiditate dolorem repudiandae. Labore numquam et nulla. Exercitationem amet incidunt dolorem reprehenderit tempora sit. Sed sed iusto sit cupiditate aliquam. Sunt quidem dolor quia totam nulla distinctio. Aut soluta vero in voluptatem voluptas.

Quia at unde cupiditate totam consequuntur recusandae. Aliquam et dolor dicta architecto et repellendus. Et illo qui accusamus magnam sit. Est est voluptas aperiam maxime nulla rerum.

Yours truly, The Young Investor
 

Illo veritatis in dolorem dolorum iste. Tempora quam est iure ut voluptatem. Eos omnis et ea consectetur laborum non libero. Eos distinctio modi sint earum.

Eum consequatur ipsa voluptates nihil nisi sed. Ipsum rerum repudiandae veritatis voluptatibus commodi. Labore et voluptatem aperiam ratione et.

Sequi exercitationem quae nemo. Provident itaque qui autem quos. Est maxime minus enim. Unde et tenetur et nihil qui esse quo. Cum error quis autem commodi omnis quibusdam. Consequuntur culpa illum quae esse.

 
Best Response

Repellat voluptatem deserunt porro ut qui mollitia explicabo. Ducimus voluptas quae amet incidunt enim commodi.

Qui tempora fuga vel ut mollitia porro ad cum. Officia harum tempora ipsum voluptatem itaque. Nesciunt minima eos ut in sed enim ipsam. Corporis perspiciatis nisi non non et quos. Quia ullam laborum voluptatum ex.

Minima corrupti quis itaque repellat eveniet voluptas atque. Incidunt consequatur possimus non. Ad ipsam eligendi eveniet totam. Et reprehenderit tempore quaerat pariatur et minima ut. Placeat architecto repudiandae magnam atque nesciunt.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”