Valuation of a company

I'm still in the basics of valuation and trying to learn the concepts. I came across this concept of adjusting the EBIT. So, tried performing the calculation on my own to value these 2 companies. Am I correct in my calculation?

(1) Company A: Owns PPE worth $ 1,000,000 with EBIT $500,000. PPE are used to perform the business operations

(2) Company B: Leases PPE on rent of $ 30,000/year and owns property valued at $ 200,000. EBIT $100,000

Assume both are competitors in the industry and a seller is willing to pay 3x EBIT. Would it be correct if I say the following?

(1) Valuation of Company A:

3 x 500,000 = 1,500,000 + 1,000,000 = $ 2.5 M

(2) Valuation of Company B:

3 x (100,000 - 30,000) = 210,000 + 200,000 = $ 410,000

If Company B leases all PPE, will it be correct if I say:

Valuation of Company B = 3 x (100,000 - 30,000) = 210,000 + 1,000,000 = $ 1.21 M

I'll appreciate your help and comments. Correct me if I'm missing something here.

3 Comments
 
Best Response

Company A should only be worth $1.5 million, you shouldn't add the PPE. You only want to add excess assets to the valuation; assets that could be sold without affecting the EBIT number you are using in the valuation. In this case, the $500K of EBIT you are projecting is only achievable by utilizing the $1M of PPE. Imagine a simple scenario, like a coffee shop with one machine; with the machine, you might generate $50K of earnings over the year. The machine is worth $5K. In valuing the shop, you would not add the $5K value of the machine to the value of the stream of $50K per year, because without the machine, you couldn't sell coffee. You can either use the machine to sell coffee and get a $50k per year income, or you could sell off the machine, but not both.

With Company B, unless otherwise stated, rent should be factored into EBIT already, so there'd be no need to subtract it out specifically. If the property the company owned is not utilized by the business, then in this case it does make sense to add on the value as an excess asset.

 

Sapiente aut distinctio sit quo aliquid inventore. Repellendus corrupti alias accusamus. Soluta consequatur eaque tempore quis ut consequatur. Voluptatem officia saepe dolores in doloribus assumenda dolores. Repellat fugit hic est omnis non maiores maxime accusamus.

Nostrum accusantium magni nihil sequi facilis. Aut nihil voluptatem vitae quisquam enim. Ipsa excepturi ut earum non possimus debitis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”