Valuation of a company

I'm still in the basics of valuation and trying to learn the concepts. I came across this concept of adjusting the EBIT. So, tried performing the calculation on my own to value these 2 companies. Am I correct in my calculation?

(1) Company A: Owns PPE worth $ 1,000,000 with EBIT $500,000. PPE are used to perform the business operations

(2) Company B: Leases PPE on rent of $ 30,000/year and owns property valued at $ 200,000. EBIT $100,000

Assume both are competitors in the industry and a seller is willing to pay 3x EBIT. Would it be correct if I say the following?

(1) Valuation of Company A:

3 x 500,000 = 1,500,000 + 1,000,000 = $ 2.5 M

(2) Valuation of Company B:

3 x (100,000 - 30,000) = 210,000 + 200,000 = $ 410,000

If Company B leases all PPE, will it be correct if I say:

Valuation of Company B = 3 x (100,000 - 30,000) = 210,000 + 1,000,000 = $ 1.21 M

I'll appreciate your help and comments. Correct me if I'm missing something here.

3 Comments
 
Best Response

Company A should only be worth $1.5 million, you shouldn't add the PPE. You only want to add excess assets to the valuation; assets that could be sold without affecting the EBIT number you are using in the valuation. In this case, the $500K of EBIT you are projecting is only achievable by utilizing the $1M of PPE. Imagine a simple scenario, like a coffee shop with one machine; with the machine, you might generate $50K of earnings over the year. The machine is worth $5K. In valuing the shop, you would not add the $5K value of the machine to the value of the stream of $50K per year, because without the machine, you couldn't sell coffee. You can either use the machine to sell coffee and get a $50k per year income, or you could sell off the machine, but not both.

With Company B, unless otherwise stated, rent should be factored into EBIT already, so there'd be no need to subtract it out specifically. If the property the company owned is not utilized by the business, then in this case it does make sense to add on the value as an excess asset.

 

Ut ut inventore ipsa sit amet. Tenetur dolorum et sit. Corrupti atque labore quod dolor enim.

Placeat corporis tempore id. Sequi est numquam ad numquam. Fugiat facere autem unde modi maxime consequatur. Voluptate et ut mollitia voluptatem. Accusamus rem enim eveniet necessitatibus officia. Veritatis enim dolor distinctio aut. Tenetur ea aut cum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”